The fact that both options accept negative forms suggests that maybe
they aren't negative forms of each other.  They are, but that isn't
clear even by examining common.opt.  Use NegativeAlias to make it
abundantly clear.

The 'Optimization' keyword next to freg-struct-return was the only
thing that caused flag_pcc_struct_return to be a per-function flag,
and ipa-inline relied on that.  After making it an alias, the
Optimization keyword was no longer operational.  I'm not sure it was
sensible or desirable for flag_pcc_struct_return to be a per-function
setting, but this patch does not intend to change behavior.

Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and ppc64le-linux-gnu.  Ok to install?


for  gcc/ChangeLog

        * common.opt (freg-struct-return): Make it explicitly
        fpcc-struct-return's NegativeAlias.  Copy Optimization...
        (freg-struct-return): ... here.
---
 gcc/common.opt |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/common.opt b/gcc/common.opt
index ad3488447752b..12d93c76a1e63 100644
--- a/gcc/common.opt
+++ b/gcc/common.opt
@@ -2406,7 +2406,7 @@ Common RejectNegative Joined UInteger Optimization
 -fpack-struct=<number> Set initial maximum structure member alignment.
 
 fpcc-struct-return
-Common Var(flag_pcc_struct_return,1) Init(DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN)
+Common Var(flag_pcc_struct_return,1) Init(DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN) 
Optimization
 Return small aggregates in memory, not registers.
 
 fpeel-loops
@@ -2596,7 +2596,7 @@ Common Var(flag_record_gcc_switches)
 Record gcc command line switches in the object file.
 
 freg-struct-return
-Common Var(flag_pcc_struct_return,0) Optimization
+Common NegativeAlias Alias(fpcc_struct_return) Optimization
 Return small aggregates in registers.
 
 fregmove

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker            https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
   Free Software Activist                   GNU Toolchain Engineer
More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity
Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive

Reply via email to