Hi! As stated in the PR, the -Wuninitialized warnings are bogus if fields have NSDMI, as they are actually initialized then.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? What about 4.7.2? 2012-06-11 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR c++/53594 * class.c (check_bases_and_members): Avoid -Wuninitialized diagnostics for non-static const members or references if they use NSDMI. * g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi7.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/class.c.jj 2012-06-07 08:27:35.000000000 +0200 +++ gcc/cp/class.c 2012-06-11 10:36:39.050739846 +0200 @@ -5122,7 +5122,8 @@ check_bases_and_members (tree t) { tree type; - if (TREE_CODE (field) != FIELD_DECL) + if (TREE_CODE (field) != FIELD_DECL + || DECL_INITIAL (field) != NULL_TREE) continue; type = TREE_TYPE (field); --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi7.C.jj 2012-06-11 10:44:35.723568438 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi7.C 2012-06-11 10:50:16.000000000 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +// PR c++/53594 +// { dg-do compile } +// { dg-options "-std=c++11 -Wuninitialized" } + +struct A +{ + const int a = 6; // { dg-bogus "non-static const member" } + static int b; + int &c = b; // { dg-bogus "non-static reference" } +}; + +struct B +{ + const int d; // { dg-warning "non-static const member" } + int &e; // { dg-warning "non-static reference" } + int f = 7; +}; Jakub