> On Apr 19, 2024, at 16:54, Tom Tromey <t...@tromey.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Qing Zhao <qing.z...@oracle.com> writes: > >> +The size of the union is as if the flexiable array member were omitted >> +except that it may have more trailing padding than the omission would imply. >> + >> +If all the members of a union are flexiable array member, the size of > > There's a couple of spots that say "flexiable" which should say "flexible". Thanks for catching those typo, I will fix them. Qing > > thanks, > Tom
- [RFC][PATCH v1 0/4] Allow flexible array members in unions an... Qing Zhao
- [RFC][PATCH v1 2/4] C and C++ FE changes to support flex... Qing Zhao
- [RFC][PATCH v1 1/4] Documentation change Qing Zhao
- Re: [RFC][PATCH v1 1/4] Documentation change Tom Tromey
- Re: [RFC][PATCH v1 1/4] Documentation change Qing Zhao
- Re: [RFC][PATCH v1 1/4] Documentation change Joseph Myers
- Re: [RFC][PATCH v1 1/4] Documentation change Qing Zhao
- Re: [RFC][PATCH v1 1/4] Documentation change Joseph Myers
- [RFC][PATCH v1 3/4] Add testing cases for flexible array... Qing Zhao
- [RFC][PATCH v1 4/4] Adjust testcases for flexible array ... Qing Zhao
- Re: [RFC][PATCH v1 0/4] Allow flexible array members in ... Kees Cook