From: Olivier Hainque <hain...@adacore.com>

Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and ppc64el-linux-gnu.  Also tested with
gcc-13 on ppc64-vx7r2 and ppc-vx7r2.  Ok to install?

for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

        * gcc.target/powerpc/swaps-p8-20.c: Change powerpc_altivec_ok
        require-effective-target test into vmx_hw.
        * gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-vector-5.c: Change powerpc_vsx_ok
        require-effective-target test into vsx_hw.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/swaps-p8-20.c  |    2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-vector-5.c |    5 +----
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/swaps-p8-20.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/swaps-p8-20.c
index 564e8acb1f421..755519bfe847d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/swaps-p8-20.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/swaps-p8-20.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do run } */
-/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_altivec_ok } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target vmx_hw } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power8 -maltivec" } */
 
 /* The expansion for vector character multiply introduces a vperm operation.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-vector-5.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-vector-5.c
index dcc88b1f3a4c6..37a324b6f897d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-vector-5.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-vector-5.c
@@ -1,11 +1,8 @@
 /* { dg-do run { target lp64 } } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-darwin* } } */
-/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target vsx_hw } */
 /* { dg-options "-mvsx -O2" } */
 
-/* This will run, and someday we should add the support to test whether we are
-   running on VSX hardware.  */
-
 #include <altivec.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker            https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
   Free Software Activist                   GNU Toolchain Engineer
More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity
Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive

Reply via email to