Andrew Carlotti <andrew.carlo...@arm.com> writes:
> We don't yet have a separate feature flag for FEAT_LRCPC2 (and adding
> one will require extending the feature bitmask).  Instead, make the
> FEAT_LRCPC patterns available when either armv8.4-a or +rcpc3 is
> specified.  On the other hand, we already have a +rcpc flag, so this
> dependency can be specified directly.
>
> The cpunative test needed updating because it used an invalid Features
> list, since lrcpc3 requires both ilrcpc and lrcpc to be present.
> Without this change, host_detect_local_cpu would return the architecture
> string 'armv8-a+dotprod+crc+crypto+rcpc3+norcpc'.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>       * config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def: Add RCPC to
>       RCPC3 dependencies.
>       * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (AARCH64_ISA_RCPC8_4): Add test for
>       RCPC3 bit
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>       * gcc.target/aarch64/cpunative/info_24: Include lrcpc and ilrcpc.
>
> ---
>
> Bootstrapped and regression tested on aarch64.  I also verified that the
> atomic-store.c and ldapr-sext.c tests would pass when replacing 'armv8.4-a'
> with 'armv8-a+rcpc3'.
>
> Ok for master?
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def 
> b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def
> index 
> 3155eccd39c8e6825b7fc2bb0d0514c2e7e559bf..42ec0eec31e2ddb0cc6f83fdbaf0fd4eac5ca7f4
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ AARCH64_FMV_FEATURE("fp16fml", FP16FML, (F16FML))
>  
>  AARCH64_OPT_FMV_EXTENSION("rcpc", RCPC, (), (), (), "lrcpc")
>  
> -AARCH64_OPT_FMV_EXTENSION("rcpc3", RCPC3, (), (), (), "lrcpc3")
> +AARCH64_OPT_FMV_EXTENSION("rcpc3", RCPC3, (RCPC), (), (), "lrcpc3")
>  
>  AARCH64_OPT_FMV_EXTENSION("i8mm", I8MM, (SIMD), (), (), "i8mm")
>  
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h
> index 
> 45e901cda644dbe4eaae709e685954f1a6f7dbcf..5870e3f812f6cb0674488b8e17ab7278003d2d54
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h
> @@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ constexpr auto AARCH64_FL_DEFAULT_ISA_MODE = 
> AARCH64_FL_SM_OFF;
>  #define AARCH64_ISA_SHA3        (aarch64_isa_flags & AARCH64_FL_SHA3)
>  #define AARCH64_ISA_F16FML      (aarch64_isa_flags & AARCH64_FL_F16FML)
>  #define AARCH64_ISA_RCPC        (aarch64_isa_flags & AARCH64_FL_RCPC)
> -#define AARCH64_ISA_RCPC8_4     (aarch64_isa_flags & AARCH64_FL_V8_4A)
> +#define AARCH64_ISA_RCPC8_4     (aarch64_isa_flags \
> +                                 & (AARCH64_FL_V8_4A | AARCH64_FL_RCPC3))

It looks like the effect of these two changes is that:

* armv9-a+rcpc3+norcpc leaves TARGET_RCPC2 true and TARGET_RCPC and
  TARGET_RCPC3 false.

* armv8-a+rcpc3+norcpc correctly leaves all three false.

If we add the RCPC3->RCPC dependency then I think we should also
require FL_RCPC alongside FL_V8_4A.  I.e.:

#define AARCH64_ISA_RCPC8_4     (AARCH64_ISA_RCPC \
                                 && (aarch64_isa_flags \
                                     & (AARCH64_FL_V8_4A | AARCH64_FL_RCPC3)))

OK with that change, thanks.

Richard


>  #define AARCH64_ISA_RNG                 (aarch64_isa_flags & AARCH64_FL_RNG)
>  #define AARCH64_ISA_V8_5A       (aarch64_isa_flags & AARCH64_FL_V8_5A)
>  #define AARCH64_ISA_TME                 (aarch64_isa_flags & AARCH64_FL_TME)
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/cpunative/info_24 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/cpunative/info_24
> index 
> 8d3c16a10910af977c560782f9d659c0e51286fd..3c64e00ca3a416ef565bc0b4a5b3e5bd9cfc41bc
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/cpunative/info_24
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/cpunative/info_24
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
>  processor    : 0
>  BogoMIPS     : 100.00
> -Features     : fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32 asimddp lrcpc3
> +Features     : fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32 asimddp lrcpc 
> ilrcpc lrcpc3
>  CPU implementer      : 0xfe
>  CPU architecture: 8
>  CPU variant  : 0x0
>  CPU part     : 0xd08
> -CPU revision : 2
> \ No newline at end of file
> +CPU revision : 2

Reply via email to