On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 1:21 AM Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
>
> There's no default bitmap obstack during global CTORs, so allocate the
> bitmap locally.
>
> Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> Richard.
>
>         PR middle-end/114599
>         * symtab.cc (ifunc_ref_map): Do not use auto_bitmap.
>         (is_caller_ifunc_resolver): Optimize bitmap_bit_p/bitmap_set_bit
>         pair.
>         (symtab_node::check_ifunc_callee_symtab_nodes): Properly
>         allocate ifunc_ref_map here.
> ---
>  gcc/symtab.cc | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/symtab.cc b/gcc/symtab.cc
> index 3256133891d..3b018ab3ea2 100644
> --- a/gcc/symtab.cc
> +++ b/gcc/symtab.cc
> @@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ check_ifunc_resolver (cgraph_node *node, void *data)
>    return false;
>  }
>
> -static auto_bitmap ifunc_ref_map;
> +static bitmap ifunc_ref_map;
>
>  /* Return true if any caller of NODE is an ifunc resolver.  */
>
> @@ -1404,9 +1404,8 @@ is_caller_ifunc_resolver (cgraph_node *node)
>
>        /* Skip if it has been visited.  */
>        unsigned int uid = e->caller->get_uid ();
> -      if (bitmap_bit_p (ifunc_ref_map, uid))
> +      if (!bitmap_set_bit (ifunc_ref_map, uid))
>         continue;
> -      bitmap_set_bit (ifunc_ref_map, uid);
>
>        if (is_caller_ifunc_resolver (e->caller))
>         {
> @@ -1437,6 +1436,9 @@ symtab_node::check_ifunc_callee_symtab_nodes (void)
>  {
>    symtab_node *node;
>
> +  bitmap_obstack_initialize (NULL);
> +  ifunc_ref_map = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
> +
>    FOR_EACH_SYMBOL (node)
>      {
>        cgraph_node *cnode = dyn_cast <cgraph_node *> (node);
> @@ -1455,7 +1457,8 @@ symtab_node::check_ifunc_callee_symtab_nodes (void)
>         cnode->called_by_ifunc_resolver = true;
>      }
>
> -  bitmap_clear (ifunc_ref_map);
> +  BITMAP_FREE (ifunc_ref_map);
> +  bitmap_obstack_release (NULL);
>  }
>
>  /* Verify symbol table for internal consistency.  */
> --
> 2.35.3

The bug isn't fixed:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114599#c5

-- 
H.J.

Reply via email to