On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nils...@axis.com> wrote: > Trying --enable-build-with-cxx revealed a build regression for > cris-elf from the recent atomic support bits. Tested the same, > no regressions. > > Casting those INTVAL's would've been a tiny bit uglier than > using a temp, thus. <rant>Hey, those were stashed there as ints > so what's wrong with passing them as that! And making "and" a > reserved word, what's up with that?
In fact, even within C standards, "and" is reserved -- just the same way "bool", with the proper includes. > Is that supposed to be easier on the eye or to write than "&"? Some people find it easier to read than "&&" :-) -- Gaby
