On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 12:25:42PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Ideally we?d clear TREE_ADDRESSABLE but set DECL_NOT_GIMPLE_REG,
> > I think the analysis where we check the base would be a more
> > appropriate place to enforce that.
> 
> So like this?

Hm, I was thinking of non_rewritable_lvalue_p/non_rewritable_mem_ref_base
though that requires duplicating, so I guess handling in maybe_optimize_var 
would work.

I do now wonder whether setting DECL_NOT_GIMPLE_REG_P in bitfield
lowering would prevail?

(sorry for approving the earlier patch now, I was too quick and didn't
remember the discussion)

Richard.

> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
> 
> 2024-03-11  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR tree-optimization/114278
>       * tree-ssa.cc (maybe_optimize_var): If large/huge _BitInt vars are no
>       longer addressable, set DECL_NOT_GIMPLE_REG_P on them.
> 
>       * gcc.dg/bitint-99.c: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/tree-ssa.cc.jj        2024-01-03 11:51:39.902615009 +0100
> +++ gcc/tree-ssa.cc   2024-03-09 23:34:12.469223987 +0100
> @@ -1785,6 +1785,20 @@ maybe_optimize_var (tree var, bitmap add
>             fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
>           }
>       }
> +      else if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (var)) == BITINT_TYPE
> +            && (cfun->curr_properties & PROP_gimple_lbitint) != 0
> +            && TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (var)) > MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE)
> +     {
> +       /* Don't rewrite large/huge _BitInt vars after _BitInt lowering
> +          into SSA form.  */
> +       DECL_NOT_GIMPLE_REG_P (var) = 1;
> +       if (dump_file)
> +         {
> +           fprintf (dump_file, "_BitInt var after its lowering: ");
> +           print_generic_expr (dump_file, var);
> +           fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
> +         }
> +     }
>        else if (DECL_NOT_GIMPLE_REG_P (var))
>       {
>         maybe_reg = true;
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-99.c.jj       2024-03-08 14:26:17.658069942 
> +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-99.c  2024-03-08 14:25:36.292645965 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/114278 */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target bitint } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-ccp" } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-mavx2" { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */
> +
> +void
> +foo (void *p)
> +{
> +  _BitInt(64) b = *(_BitInt(64) *) __builtin_memmove (&b, p, sizeof 
> (_BitInt(64)));
> +}
> +
> +#if __BITINT_MAXWIDTH__ >= 128
> +void
> +bar (void *p)
> +{
> +  _BitInt(128) b = *(_BitInt(128) *) __builtin_memmove (&b, p, sizeof 
> (_BitInt(128)));
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#if __BITINT_MAXWIDTH__ >= 256
> +void
> +baz (void *p)
> +{
> +  _BitInt(256) b = *(_BitInt(256) *) __builtin_memmove (&b, p, sizeof 
> (_BitInt(256)));
> +}
> +#endif
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to