On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 10:07:33PM -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2024, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:26:00PM -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > On Tue, 5 Mar 2024, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 07:14:54PM -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Mar 2024, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- >8 --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When streaming in a nested template-template parameter as in the
> > > > > > attached testcase, we end up reaching the containing
> > > > > > template-template
> > > > > > parameter in 'tpl_parms_fini'. We should not set the DECL_CONTEXT to
> > > > > > this (nested) template-template parameter, as it should already be
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > struct that the outer template-template parameter is declared on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PR c++/98881
> > > > > >
> > > > > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * module.cc (trees_out::tpl_parms_fini): Clarify logic purely
> > > > > > for checking purposes. Don't consider a template template
> > > > > > parameter as the owning template.
> > > > > > (trees_in::tpl_parms_fini): Don't consider a template template
> > > > > > parameter as the owning template.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H: New test.
> > > > > > * g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_b.C: New test.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <[email protected]>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > gcc/cp/module.cc | 17
> > > > > > ++++++++++++-----
> > > > > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H | 11 +++++++++++
> > > > > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_b.C | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > > > > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H
> > > > > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_b.C
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/module.cc b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> > > > > > index 67f132d28d7..5663d01ed9c 100644
> > > > > > --- a/gcc/cp/module.cc
> > > > > > +++ b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> > > > > > @@ -10126,10 +10126,14 @@ trees_out::tpl_parms_fini (tree tmpl,
> > > > > > unsigned tpl_levels)
> > > > > > tree dflt = TREE_PURPOSE (parm);
> > > > > > tree_node (dflt);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - if (streaming_p ())
> > > > > > + if (CHECKING_P && streaming_p ())
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > + /* Sanity check that the DECL_CONTEXT we'll infer when
> > > > > > + streaming in is correct. */
> > > > > > tree decl = TREE_VALUE (parm);
> > > > > > - if (TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
> > > > > > + if (TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_DECL
> > > > > > + /* A template template parm is not the owning
> > > > > > template. */
> > > > > > + && !DECL_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM_P (tmpl))
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > tree ctx = DECL_CONTEXT (decl);
> > > > > > tree inner = DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (decl);
> > > > > > @@ -10164,8 +10168,13 @@ trees_in::tpl_parms_fini (tree tmpl,
> > > > > > unsigned tpl_levels)
> > > > > > return false;
> > > > > > TREE_PURPOSE (parm) = dflt;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + /* Original template template parms have a context
> > > > > > + of their owning template. Reduced ones do not.
> > > > > > + But if TMPL is itself a template template parm
> > > > > > + then it cannot be the owning template. */
> > > > > > tree decl = TREE_VALUE (parm);
> > > > > > - if (TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
> > > > > > + if (TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_DECL
> > > > > > + && !DECL_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM_P (tmpl))
> > > > >
> > > > > IIUC a TEMPLATE_DECL inside a template parameter list always
> > > > > represents
> > > > > a template template parm, so won't this effectively disable the
> > > > > DECL_CONTEXT setting logic?
> > > >
> > > > This is only when 'tmpl' (i.e. the containing TEMPLATE_DECL that we're
> > > > streaming) is itself a template template parm.
> > >
> > > D'oh, makes sense.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > tree inner = DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (decl);
> > > > > > tree tpi = (TREE_CODE (inner) == TYPE_DECL
> > > > > > @@ -10173,8 +10182,6 @@ trees_in::tpl_parms_fini (tree tmpl,
> > > > > > unsigned tpl_levels)
> > > > > > : DECL_INITIAL (inner));
> > > > > > bool original = (TEMPLATE_PARM_LEVEL (tpi)
> > > > > > == TEMPLATE_PARM_ORIG_LEVEL (tpi));
> > > > > > - /* Original template template parms have a context
> > > > > > - of their owning template. Reduced ones do not. */
> > > > > > if (original)
> > > > > > DECL_CONTEXT (decl) = tmpl;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H
> > > > > > b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H
> > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > index 00000000000..21bbc054fa3
> > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H
> > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> > > > > > +// PR c++/98881
> > > > > > +// { dg-additional-options "-fmodule-header" }
> > > > > > +// { dg-module-cmi {} }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +template <typename P> struct X {};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +template<template <typename> typename TT>
> > > > > > +struct X<TT<int>> {
> > > > > > + template<template <typename> typename UU>
> > > > > > + void f (X<UU<int>>&);
> > > > > > +};
> > > > >
> > > > > I wonder why the partial specialization is relevant here? I can't
> > > > > seem to trigger the ICE without the partial specialization.
> > > > > Slightly further reduced to not use bound ttps:
> > > > >
> > > > > template<template<class> class TT>
> > > > > struct X { };
> > > > >
> > > > > template<template<class> class TT> requires true
> > > > > struct X<TT> {
> > > > > template<template<class> class UU>
> > > > > void f(X<UU>);
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe the expectation is that tpl_parms_fini for UU should be called
> > > > > with tpl_levels=1 (so that we stream only its own template parameters)
> > > > > but it's instead called with tpl_levels=3 for some reason?
> > > > >
> > > > > IIUC that assert should always hold in the first iteration of the loop
> > > > > (for the ttp's own template parameters). Perhaps for subsequent
> > > > > iterations we need to actually stream the contexts?
> > > > >
> > > > > Ah, but we also ICE in the same spot with:
> > > > >
> > > > > template<template<class> class TT> struct X; // #1
> > > > > template<template<class> class UU> struct X { }; // #2
> > > > >
> > > > > because DECL_CONTEXT of UU is #1 but tmpl is #2 (which seem like a
> > > > > bug)... But maybe this suggests we should just stream the
> > > > > DECL_CONTEXT
> > > > > of each ttp as-is instead of trying to avoid it via an apparently
> > > > > fragile assumption?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > That seems reasonable to me. Probably better to aim for correctness at
> > > > this stage rather than relying on things I don't understand for slight
> > > > performance gains.
> > > >
> > > > I started putting together a patch to always restream the DECL_CONTEXT,
> > > > but as I was doing so I realised that actually, we stream the context
> > > > anyway, and this value should be correct to start with? I don't think
> > > > deduplication should affect this, but I've added to the test to make
> > > > sure that there's no issues here that I can see.
> > >
> > > Where do we otherwise stream the context? In trees_out::core_vals we
> > > seem to avoid streaming the context for template parms (including ttps):
> > >
> > > if (!DECL_TEMPLATE_PARM_P (t))
> > > WT (t->decl_minimal.context);
> >
> > Ah whoops, I was looking at the wrong 'context' (type_common.context). I
> > guess I need to find a testcase that actually relies on DECL_CONTEXT
> > being set correctly for template-template parameters.
>
> It might be hard to come up with such a testcase since DECL_CONTEXT
> has been unreliably set for ttps probably since inception (for example
> for level-lowered ttps), so most logic is already robust to context-less
> ttps. But I suppose we might as well stream it anyway.
Fair enough. I've tried for a while but I haven't been able to work
anything out; maybe another time.
Otherwise here's an updated version of the patch. Bootstrapped and
regtested (so far just modules.exp) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: OK for
trunk if full regtest succeeds?
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] c++: Stream DECL_CONTEXT for template template parms [PR98881]
When streaming in a nested template-template parameter as in the
attached testcase, we end up reaching the containing template-template
parameter in 'tpl_parms_fini'. We should not set the DECL_CONTEXT to
this (nested) template-template parameter, as it should already be the
struct that the outer template-template parameter is declared on.
The precise logic for what DECL_CONTEXT should be for a template
template parameter in various situations seems rather obscure. Rather
than trying to determine the assumptions that need to hold, it seems
simpler to just always re-stream the DECL_CONTEXT as needed for now.
PR c++/98881
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* module.cc (trees_out::tpl_parms_fini): Stream out DECL_CONTEXT
for template template parameters.
(trees_in::tpl_parms_fini): Read it.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3.h: New test.
* g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H: New test.
* g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_b.C: New test.
* g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_c.C: New test.
Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Palka <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <[email protected]>
---
gcc/cp/module.cc | 41 +++++--------------
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3.h | 12 ++++++
.../g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H | 5 +++
.../g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_b.C | 5 +++
.../g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_c.C | 15 +++++++
5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3.h
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_b.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_c.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/module.cc b/gcc/cp/module.cc
index 67f132d28d7..fcb449563ab 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/module.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/module.cc
@@ -10126,23 +10126,12 @@ trees_out::tpl_parms_fini (tree tmpl, unsigned
tpl_levels)
tree dflt = TREE_PURPOSE (parm);
tree_node (dflt);
- if (streaming_p ())
- {
- tree decl = TREE_VALUE (parm);
- if (TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
- {
- tree ctx = DECL_CONTEXT (decl);
- tree inner = DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (decl);
- tree tpi = (TREE_CODE (inner) == TYPE_DECL
- ? TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM_INDEX (TREE_TYPE (decl))
- : DECL_INITIAL (inner));
- bool original = (TEMPLATE_PARM_LEVEL (tpi)
- == TEMPLATE_PARM_ORIG_LEVEL (tpi));
- /* Original template template parms have a context
- of their owning template. Reduced ones do not. */
- gcc_checking_assert (original ? ctx == tmpl : !ctx);
- }
- }
+ /* Template template parameters need a context of their owning
+ template. This is quite tricky to infer correctly on stream-in
+ (see PR c++/98881) so we'll just provide it directly. */
+ tree decl = TREE_VALUE (parm);
+ if (TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
+ tree_node (DECL_CONTEXT (decl));
}
}
}
@@ -10160,24 +10149,14 @@ trees_in::tpl_parms_fini (tree tmpl, unsigned
tpl_levels)
{
tree parm = TREE_VEC_ELT (vec, ix);
tree dflt = tree_node ();
- if (get_overrun ())
- return false;
TREE_PURPOSE (parm) = dflt;
tree decl = TREE_VALUE (parm);
if (TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
- {
- tree inner = DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (decl);
- tree tpi = (TREE_CODE (inner) == TYPE_DECL
- ? TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM_INDEX (TREE_TYPE (decl))
- : DECL_INITIAL (inner));
- bool original = (TEMPLATE_PARM_LEVEL (tpi)
- == TEMPLATE_PARM_ORIG_LEVEL (tpi));
- /* Original template template parms have a context
- of their owning template. Reduced ones do not. */
- if (original)
- DECL_CONTEXT (decl) = tmpl;
- }
+ DECL_CONTEXT (decl) = tree_node ();
+
+ if (get_overrun ())
+ return false;
}
}
return true;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3.h
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3.h
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b0dcf353c23
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3.h
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// PR c++/98881
+
+template <typename P> struct X {};
+
+template<template <typename> typename TT>
+struct X<TT<int>> {
+ template<template <typename> typename UU>
+ void f (X<UU<int>>&);
+};
+
+template<template<class> class TT> struct Y;
+template<template<class> class UU> struct Y { };
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..47464081f25
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// PR c++/98881
+// { dg-additional-options "-fmodule-header" }
+// { dg-module-cmi {} }
+
+#include "tpl-tpl-parm-3.h"
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_b.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_b.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1e3cc6c444f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_b.C
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// PR c++/98881
+// { dg-additional-options "-fmodules-ts -fno-module-lazy" }
+
+#include "tpl-tpl-parm-3.h"
+import "tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H";
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_c.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_c.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5edba6cc64f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-tpl-parm-3_c.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// PR c++/98881
+// { dg-additional-options "-fmodules-ts" }
+
+import "tpl-tpl-parm-3_a.H";
+
+template <typename T> struct A {};
+template <typename T> struct B {};
+
+void foo() {
+ X<A<int>> a;
+ X<B<int>> b;
+ a.f(b);
+
+ Y<A> y;
+}
--
2.43.2
