On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 06:54:49PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 06:25:21PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > I guess we need some testsuite coverage for caller/callee ABI match of
> > struct S { char p[64]; };
> > struct S foo (...);
>
> Maybe the test below? Passes on x86_64 -m32/-m64, but I guess that doesn't
> care at all about the named vs. not named distinction.
> The test is a copy of c23-stdarg-4.c, just with all the functions returning
> a large struct.
>
> 2024-02-27 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
>
> * gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c: New test.
I've committed the testcase to trunk now as obvious, so that we can see what
targets are broken.
Jakub
