Hi David - and thanks for posting an outline for libdiagnostics at
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/libdiagnostics

Currently this shows both libdiagnosts and libdiagnostics-sarif-dump integrated into GCC. Is this the plan or would those be available as a top-level project (the program as an example for the library), possibly with the library sources also pushed to GCC?

Oh, and one question as I stumbled over that today: Would libdiagnostics now (or in the future) use libtextstyle for formatting (and another possible sink: HTML)?

Simon

Am 23.11.2023 um 18:36 schrieb Pedro Alves:
Hi David,

On 2023-11-21 22:20, David Malcolm wrote:
Here's v2 of the "libdiagnostics" shared library idea; see:
   https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/libdiagnostics

As in v1, patch 1 (for GCC) shows libdiagnostic.h (the public
header file), along with examples of simple self-contained programs that
show various uses of the API.

As in v1, patch 2 (for GCC) is the work-in-progress implementation.

Patch 3 (for GCC) adds a new libdiagnostics++.h, a wrapper API providing
some syntactic sugar when using the API from C++.  I've been using this
to "eat my own dogfood" and write a simple SARIF-dumping tool:
   https://github.com/davidmalcolm/libdiagnostics-sarif-dump

Patch 4 (for GCC) is an internal change needed by patch 1.

Patch 5 (for GCC) updates GCC's source printing code so that when
there's no column information, we don't print annotation lines.  This
fixes the extra lines seen using it from gas discussed in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/635575.html

Patch 6 (for binutils) is an updated version of the experiment at using
the API from gas.

Thoughts?

Do you have plans on making this a top level library instead?  That would allow 
easily
making it a non-optional dependency for binutils, as we could have the library 
in
the binutils-gdb repo as well, for instance.  From the Cauldron discussion I 
understood that
the diagnostics stuff doesn't depend on much of GCC's data structures, and 
doesn't rely on
the garbage collector.  Is there something preventing that?  (Other than 
"it's-a-matter-of-time/effort",
of course.)

Pedro Alves


Reply via email to