On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Sterling Augustine <saugust...@google.com> wrote: > After finding yet another bug in the previous patch dealing with > pretty-printing > decls for dwarf in canonical form, I have figured out a way to do it that is > less invasive and much cleaner. > > This updated patch simply wraps the two entry points into the decl pretty- > printer called from cxx_dwarf_name with new functions that set the > appropriate flag on the pretty printer. This is much cleaner and avoids > the need for translating flags for C++ pretty-printing into standard C > pretty printing flags. > > OK for mainline?
OK.
