On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 09:51, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 at 22:27, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/time/clock/file/io.cc > > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/time/clock/file/io.cc > > @@ -17,6 +17,23 @@ test_ostream() > > VERIFY( ss1.str() == ss2.str() ); > > } > > > > +void > > +test_format() > > +{ > > + using namespace std::chrono; > > + auto t = file_clock::now(); > > + > > + auto s = std::format("{}", t); > > + std::ostringstream ss; > > + ss << t; > > + VERIFY( s == ss.str() ); > > + > > + // PR libstdc++/113500 > > + auto ft = clock_cast<file_clock>(sys_days(2024y/January/21)) + 0ms + > > 2.5s; > > + s = std::format("{}", ft); > > + VERIFY( s == "2024-01-17 00:00:02.500"); > > Well obviously that should be 2024-01-21 and I should add a call to > test_format() in main() so it actually runs.
And I did the same in the gps/io.cc test! I'll push this fix for that one: --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/time/clock/gps/io.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/time/clock/gps/io.cc @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ test_format() // PR libstdc++/113500 s = std::format("{}", gt + 150ms + 10.5s); - VERIFY( s == "2000-01-01 00:00:35.650" ); + VERIFY( s == "2000-01-01 00:00:23.650" ); } void @@ -65,5 +65,6 @@ test_parse() int main() { test_ostream(); + test_format(); test_parse(); }