> On Jan 19, 2024, at 4:30 AM, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 3:46 PM Qing Zhao <qing.z...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 17, 2024, at 1:43 AM, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 7:42 AM Richard Biener
>>> <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:26 PM Qing Zhao <qing.z...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jan 15, 2024, at 4:31 AM, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> All my questions for unshare_expr relate to a  LTO bug that I currently 
>>>>>>> stuck with
>>>>>>> when using .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in bound sanitizer (only with -flto, 
>>>>>>> without -flto, no issue):
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [opc@qinzhao-aarch64-ol8 gcc]$ sh t
>>>>>>> during IPA pass: modref
>>>>>>> t.c:20:1: internal compiler error: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not 
>>>>>>> supported in LTO streams
>>>>>>> 0x14c3993 lto_write_tree
>>>>>>>      ../../latest-gcc-write/gcc/lto-streamer-out.cc:561
>>>>>>> 0x14c3aeb lto_output_tree_1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> And the value of the tree node that triggered the ICE is:
>>>>>>> (gdb) call debug_tree(expr)
>>>>>>> <ssa_name 0xfffff5761e60 type <error_mark 0xfffff56c0e58>
>>>>>>>  nothrow
>>>>>>>  def_stmt
>>>>>>>  version:13 in-free-list>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Is there any good way to debug LTO bug?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This happens usually when you have a VLA type and its type fields are not
>>>>>> properly gimplified which usually happens because the frontend fails to
>>>>>> insert a gimplification point for it (a DECL_EXPR).
>>>>> 
>>>>> I found an old gcc bug
>>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172
>>>>> ICE: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not supported in LTO streams since 
>>>>> r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57
>>>>> 
>>>>> Which is very similar to the bug I am having right now.
>>>>> 
>>>>> After further study, I suspect that the issue I am having right now with 
>>>>> the LTO streaming also
>>>>> relate to “unshare_expr”, “save_expr”, and the combination of these two, 
>>>>> I suspect that
>>>>> the current gcc cannot handle the combination of these two correctly for 
>>>>> my case.
>>>>> 
>>>>> My testing case is:
>>>>> 
>>>>> #include <stdlib.h>
>>>>> void __attribute__((__noinline__)) setup_and_test_vla (int n1, int n2, 
>>>>> int m)
>>>>> {
>>>>>  struct foo {
>>>>>      int n;
>>>>>      int p[][n2][n1] __attribute__((counted_by(n)));
>>>>>  } *f;
>>>>> 
>>>>>  f = (struct foo *) malloc (sizeof(struct foo) + m*sizeof(int[n2][n1]));
>>>>>  f->n = m;
>>>>>  f->p[m][n2][n1]=1;
>>>>>  return;
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>>>> {
>>>>> setup_and_test_vla (10, 11, 20);
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> Failed with
>>>>> my_gcc -Os -fsanitize=bounds -flto
>>>>> 
>>>>> If changing either n1 or n2 to a constant, the testing passed.
>>>>> If deleting -flto, the testing passed too.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I double checked my code per the suggestions provided by you and Jakub in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> email thread, and I think the code should be fine.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The code is following:
>>>>> 
>>>>> =====
>>>>> 504 /* Instrument array bounds for INDIRECT_REFs whose pointers are
>>>>> 505    POINTER_PLUS_EXPRs of calls to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE. We create special
>>>>> 506    builtins that gets expanded in the sanopt pass, and make an array
>>>>> 507    dimension of it.  ARRAY is the pointer to the base of the array,
>>>>> 508    which is a call to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE, *OFFSET is the offset to the
>>>>> 509    beginning of array.
>>>>> 510    Return NULL_TREE if no instrumentation is emitted.  */
>>>>> 511
>>>>> 512 tree
>>>>> 513 ubsan_instrument_bounds_indirect_ref (location_t loc, tree array, 
>>>>> tree *offset)
>>>>> 514 {
>>>>> 515   if (!is_access_with_size_p (array))
>>>>> 516     return NULL_TREE;
>>>>> 517   tree bound = get_bound_from_access_with_size (array);
>>>>> 518   /* The type of the call to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE is a pointer type to
>>>>> 519      the element of the array.  */
>>>>> 520   tree element_size = TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (array)));
>>>>> 521   gcc_assert (bound);
>>>>> 522
>>>>> 523   /* Given the offset, and the size of each element, the index can be
>>>>> 524      computed as: offset/element_size.  */
>>>>> 525   *offset = save_expr (*offset);
>>>>> 526   tree index = fold_build2 (EXACT_DIV_EXPR,
>>>>> 527                            sizetype, *offset,
>>>>> 528                            unshare_expr (element_size));
>>>>> 529   /* Create a "(T *) 0" tree node to describe the original array type.
>>>>> 530      We get the original array type from the first argument of the 
>>>>> call to
>>>>> 531      .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE (REF, COUNTED_BY_REF, 1, num_bytes, -1).
>>>>> 532
>>>>> 533      Originally, REF is a COMPONENT_REF with the original array type,
>>>>> 534      it was converted to a pointer to an ADDR_EXPR, and the 
>>>>> ADDR_EXPR's
>>>>> 535      first operand is the original COMPONENT_REF.  */
>>>>> 536   tree ref = CALL_EXPR_ARG (array, 0);
>>>>> 537   tree array_type
>>>>> 538     = unshare_expr (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND(ref, 0), 
>>>>> 0)));
>>>>> 539   tree zero_with_type = build_int_cst (build_pointer_type 
>>>>> (array_type), 0);
>>>>> 540   return build_call_expr_internal_loc (loc, IFN_UBSAN_BOUNDS,
>>>>> 541                                        void_type_node, 3, 
>>>>> zero_with_type,
>>>>> 542                                        index, bound);
>>>>> 543 }
>>>>> 
>>>>> =====
>>>>> 
>>>>> Inside gdb, the guilty IR failed in LTO streaming is from the above line 
>>>>> 520:
>>>>> TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (array))),
>>>>> 
>>>>> When I use this tree node as an operand of the expression at line 526, I 
>>>>> added
>>>>> unshare_expr.
>>>>> 
>>>>> However, I still see the guilty IR as in gdb:
>>>>> 
>>>>>           unit-size <mult_expr 0xfffff5aabf90 type <integer_type 
>>>>> 0xfffff57c0000 sizetype>
>>>>>               side-effects
>>>>>               arg:0 <mult_expr 0xfffff5aabf68 type <integer_type 
>>>>> 0xfffff57c0000 sizetype>
>>>>> 
>>>>>                   arg:0 <ssa_name 0xfffff5761e18 type <error_mark 
>>>>> 0xfffff56c0e58>
>>>>>                       nothrow
>>>>>                       def_stmt
>>>>>                       version:12 in-free-list>
>>>>>                   arg:1 <ssa_name 0xfffff5761e60 type <error_mark 
>>>>> 0xfffff56c0e58>
>>>>>                       nothrow
>>>>>                       def_stmt
>>>>>                       version:13 in-free-list>>
>>>>>               arg:1 <integer_cst 0xfffff56c10c8 constant 4>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have been stuck with this bug for quite some time.
>>>>> Any help is helpful.
>>>> 
>>>> The above hasn't been gimplified correctly, you'd instead see
>>>> a D.1234 in there, not an expression with SSA names.  That happens
>>>> when the frontend fails to emit a DECL_EXPR for a decl with this
>>>> type.
>>> 
>>> .. which then also results in missing unsharing of this expression
>>> (so the SSA names leak in)
>> 
>> Thanks a lot for the hints.
>> 
>> One correction first, the LTO bug is not related to -fsanitize=bounds.  
>> Deleting -fsanitize=bounds still can
>> repeat the failure.
>> 
>> After further debugging into the gimplification phase related with the 
>> SAVE_EXPR, I finally locate the place
>> where the unshareing of the expression is missing.   This is in the routine 
>> “pointer_int_sum” of c-family/c-common.cc:
>> 
>> 3330     {
>> 3331       if (!complain && !COMPLETE_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (result_type)))
>> 3332         return error_mark_node;
>> 3333       size_exp = size_in_bytes_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (result_type));
>> 3334       /* Wrap the pointer expression in a SAVE_EXPR to make sure it
>> 3335          is evaluated first when the size expression may depend
>> 3336          on it for VM types.  */
>> 3337       if (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (size_exp)
>> 3338           && TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (ptrop)
>> 3339           && variably_modified_type_p (TREE_TYPE (ptrop), NULL))
>> 3340         {
>> 3341           ptrop = save_expr (ptrop);
>> 3342           size_exp = build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (intop), ptrop, 
>> size_exp);
>> 3343         }
>> 3344     }
>> 
>> In the above, at line 3333, the tree node, TYPE_SIZE_UNIT 
>> (TREE_TYPE(result_type)), is returned directly as
>> the size_exp,
>> 
>> (gdb) call debug_tree(size_exp)
>> <mult_expr 0xfffff5a6f910
>>    type <integer_type 0xfffff57c0000 sizetype public unsigned DI
>>        size <integer_cst 0xfffff56c0e70 constant 64>
>>        unit-size <integer_cst 0xfffff56c0e88 constant 8>
>>        align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type 
>> 0xfffff57c0000 precision:64 min <integer_cst 0xfffff56c0ea0 0> max 
>> <integer_cst 0xfffff56d05e0 18446744073709551615>>
>>    side-effects
>>    arg:0 <mult_expr 0xfffff5a6f8e8 type <integer_type 0xfffff57c0000 
>> sizetype>
>>        side-effects
>>        arg:0 <nop_expr 0xfffff56dc540 type <integer_type 0xfffff57c0000 
>> sizetype>
>>            side-effects
>>            arg:0 <save_expr 0xfffff56dc4c0 type <integer_type 0xfffff57c05e8 
>> int>
>>                side-effects arg:0 <parm_decl 0xfffff76b6f80 n1>>>
>>        arg:1 <nop_expr 0xfffff56dc600 type <integer_type 0xfffff57c0000 
>> sizetype>
>>            side-effects
>>            arg:0 <save_expr 0xfffff56dc580 type <integer_type 0xfffff57c05e8 
>> int>
>>                side-effects arg:0 <parm_decl 0xfffff76b7000 n2>>>>
>>    arg:1 <integer_cst 0xfffff56c10c8 type <integer_type 0xfffff57c0000 
>> sizetype> constant 4>>
>> 
>> 
>> Without unshare_expr to this size_exp, the above TYPE_SIZE_UNIT node 
>> containing SAVE_EXPRs
>> is gimpflified to expressions with SSA_NAME during gimplification.  (This is 
>> unaccepted by LTO).
>> 
>> Adding an unshare_expr (size_exp) resolved this problem.
>> 
>> Although I still think that there might be potential issue with the 
>> gimpflication of SAVE_EXPRs, I dare not
>> to modify that part of the code.
>> 
>> At this moment, I will add unshare_expr to the routine “pointer_int_sum” to 
>> workaround this issue.
> 
> It's only a workaround mind you.  The bug is that the frontend fails
> to emit a DECL_EXPR which would
> trigger both unsharing and proper gimplification of the type size.

For a simple testing case:

$ cat test.c
struct annotated {
  unsigned int foo;
  char b;
  int array[] __attribute__((counted_by (foo)));
};
extern struct annotated * alloc_buf (int index);

static void bar ()
{
  struct annotated *p2 = alloc_buf (10);
  p2->array[11] = 0;
  return;
}

The C FE generates the following IR:

[opc@qinzhao-ol8u3-x86 108896]$ cat test.c.005t.original   
;; Function bar (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original


{
  struct annotated * p2 = alloc_buf (10);

    struct annotated * p2 = alloc_buf (10);
  *(.ACCESS_WITH_SIZE ((int *) &p2->array, &p2->foo, 1, 32, -1) + 44) = 0;
  return;
}

Do you see any obvious IR issue in the above? Do I miss to generate any 
DECL_EXPR in the above IR?

Thanks.

Qing


I compared it with the following testing case without the “counted-by” 
annotation 
and use an user-defined “access_with_size” function, The IR looks like exactly 
the same:

$ cat test_1.c
struct annotated {
  unsigned int foo;
  char b;
  int array[];
};
extern struct annotated *alloc_buf (int);
extern int *access_with_size (int * ref, unsigned int * size, int a, int b, int 
c);

static void bar ()
{
  struct annotated *p2 = alloc_buf (10);
  access_with_size ((int *) &p2->array, &p2->foo, 1, 32, -1)[11] = 0;
  return;
}
[opc@qinzhao-ol8u3-x86 108896]$ cat test_1.c.005t.original

;; Function bar (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original


{
  struct annotated * p2 = alloc_buf (10);

    struct annotated * p2 = alloc_buf (10);
  *(access_with_size ((int *) &p2->array, &p2->foo, 1, 32, -1) + 44) = 0;
  return;
}



> 
>> Let me know if you have any comment and suggestion.
>> 
>> Thanks a lot.
>> 
>> Qing
>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Qing
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for the help.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Qing


Reply via email to