Oh, ok, I must have missed something during testing.
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 5:37 PM juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai> wrote: > > Hi, kito. > > I found these following regression: > > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O0 at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O0 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O1 at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O1 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O2 at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O2 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin > -flto-partition=none at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin > -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin > -fno-fat-lto-objects at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin > -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O3 -g at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -Os at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -Os (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O0 at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O0 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O1 at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O1 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O2 at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O2 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin > -flto-partition=none at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin > -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin > -fno-fat-lto-objects at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin > -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O3 -g at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -Os at line 7 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -Os (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O0 at line 8 (test for errors, > line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O0 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O1 at line 8 (test for errors, > line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O1 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O2 at line 8 (test for errors, > line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O2 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin > -flto-partition=none at line 8 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin > -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin > -fno-fat-lto-objects at line 8 (test for errors, line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin > -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O3 -g at line 8 (test for errors, > line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -Os at line 8 (test for errors, > line ) > FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -Os (test for excess errors) > > Could you take a look at it ? > I am not sure whether they are caused by this patch. But I find only this > patch looks related. > ________________________________ > juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
