On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 7:02 AM Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:39 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov > <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 17, 2024, at 10:51, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:52 PM Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 1/15/24 05:56, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > > >>> Hi Vladimir, > > >>> Hi Jeff, > > >>> > > >>> Richard and Alexander have reviewed this patch and [I assume] have no > > >>> further comments. OK to merge? > > >> I think the question is whether or not we're too late. I know that > > >> Richard S has held off on his late-combine pass and I'm holding off on > > >> the ext-dce work due to the fact that we're well past stage1 close. > > >> > > >> I think the release managers ought to have the final say on this. > > > > > > I'm fine with this now, it doesn't change code generation. > > > > Thanks, Richard. > > > > I'll merge the fix for PR96388 and PR111554 -- patch 1/8. I'll commit > > cleanups and improvements to scheduler logging -- patches 2/8 - 8/8 -- when > > stage1 opens. > > This seems to have caused a compare-debug bootstrap issue on x86_64-linux, > > gcc/fortran/f95-lang.o differs > > does n_mem_deps or n_inc_deps include debug insns? > > Richard.
FWIW, I opened: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113456 -- H.J.
