On Wed, 10 Jan 2024, liuhongt wrote:
> To override -fcf-protection, -fcf-protection=none needs to be added
> and then with -fcf-protection=xxx.

I'm afraid I am struggling with the English of this, but need more time to 
untangle and suggest an alternative.

For the time being I pushed the follow-up below. Note that it's
  <code>-fcf-protection</code>
not
  <code>-fcf-protection</code>
i.e., </code> closes <code>.

Gerald


commit f834612fa014a65bd0a0380d2167d9ee05626a64
Author: Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com>
Date:   Fri Jan 12 13:54:52 2024 +0800

    gcc-14: Fix markup around -fcf-protection

diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html
index ba57abe8..9c9dfa44 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html
@@ -41,9 +41,9 @@ a work-in-progress.</p>
       identify all such cases in the source code and modify them.
   </li>
   <li><a 
href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Instrumentation-Options.html";><code>-fcf-protection=[full|branch|return|none|check]</code></a>
-      is refactored, to override <code>-fcf-protection<code>,
-      <code>-fcf-protection=none<code> needs to be added and then
-      with <code>-fcf-protection=xxx<code>.
+      is refactored, to override <code>-fcf-protection</code>,
+      <code>-fcf-protection=none</code> needs to be added and then
+      with <code>-fcf-protection=xxx</code>.
   </li>
 
 </ul>

Reply via email to