Hi!
On 2015-03-11T22:44:27+0100, I wrote:
> I committed the following in r221362:
> No libstdc++ for nvptx.
>
> The C++ front end insists to link against libstdc++ -- which we don't
> build:
>
> $ < build-gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.log grep -o 'error opening
> [^[:cntrl:]]*' | sort | uniq -c
> 2 error opening libasan.a
> 2 error opening libssp.a
> 12075 error opening libstdc++.a
>
> Based on GCC trunk r220892:
>
> === g++ Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes [-63221-]{+68841+}
> # of unexpected failures [-11751-]{+8764+}
> # of unexpected successes 6
> # of expected failures [-246-]{+249+}
> # of unresolved testcases [-5950-]{+3353+}
> # of unsupported tests [-4160-]{+4143+}
> --- gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.h
> +++ gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.h
> +/* The C++ front end insists to link against libstdc++ -- which we don't
> build.
> + Tell it to instead link against the innocuous libgcc. */
> +#define LIBSTDCXX "gcc"
Pushed to master branch commit 4d9d015cf4054f5f9df14a2c11ce81379b6caf0f
"No libstdc++ for GCN", see attached.
(Both these commit are going to get reverted once I've got libstdc++-v3
enabled for GCN, nvptx, but until then, this further harmonizes my GCN
vs. nvptx test results.)
Grüße
Thomas
-----------------
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634
München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas
Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht
München, HRB 106955
>From 4d9d015cf4054f5f9df14a2c11ce81379b6caf0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:54:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] No libstdc++ for GCN
Like commit d94fae044da071381b73a2ee8afa874b14fa3820 "No libstdc++ for nvptx"
(2015) and elsewhere.
Based on commit 5f1bed2a7af828103ca23a3546466a23e8dd2f30 (2023-12-16), there
are a ton of progressions (for test cases not actually depending on libstdc++
symbols, obviously):
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes [-178369-]{+189226+}
# of unexpected failures [-19880-]{+14089+}
# of unexpected successes 14
# of expected failures [-1684-]{+1685+}
# of unresolved testcases [-9820-]{+4837+}
# of unsupported tests [-11971-]{+11968+}
..., and only two benign "regressions":
[-UNSUPPORTED:-]{+FAIL:+} g++.dg/init/array54.C -std=c++14 {+(test for excess errors)+}
{+UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/init/array54.C -std=c++14 compilation failed to produce executable+}
[Etc.]
[...]/g++.dg/init/array54.C:5:10: fatal error: atomic: No such file or directory
That's similar to a lof of other test cases intending to '#include' standard
C++/libstdc++ headers; to be addressed in due time.
PASS: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/const2.C -std=c++98 at line 5 (test for warnings, line )
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} g++.old-deja/g++.pt/const2.C -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)
[Etc.]
ld: error: undefined symbol: A<int>::i
>>> referenced by /tmp/ccqXWCSh.o:(p)
The 'error: undefined symbol' is expected here; maybe should simply in the test
case 'dg-prune-output "referenced by"'? (This PASSed before, as the
'dg-message "i"' was satisfied by 'ld: error: unable to find library -lstdc++',
eh...)
gcc/
* config/gcn/gcn.h (LIBSTDCXX): Define to "gcc".
---
gcc/config/gcn/gcn.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/config/gcn/gcn.h b/gcc/config/gcn/gcn.h
index cb52be7a3a1..b8f2854d497 100644
--- a/gcc/config/gcn/gcn.h
+++ b/gcc/config/gcn/gcn.h
@@ -836,3 +836,7 @@ enum gcn_builtin_codes
|| M == V2SFmode || M == V2DImode || M == V2DFmode) \
? 2 \
: 1)
+
+/* The C++ front end insists to link against libstdc++ -- which we don't build.
+ Tell it to instead link against the innocuous libgcc. */
+#define LIBSTDCXX "gcc"
--
2.34.1
