On Tue, 29 May 2012, Christian Bruel wrote: > I agree. I see two potential settings of the validated field. The %< > that we just reviewed, and the case : /* We have Xno-YYY, search for > XYYY. */ > > It seems possible to remove those, I've just checked this during lunch > :-) with the scenarios described above (without use m* f* specs). > > If it is a prerequisite before my --spec patch, I'd like to propose it > as an independent one, since this is a valid modification regardless of > the --spec implementation (although it makes it clearer).
Please do send such a patch (with an explanation in each case of how "validated" still gets set with that redundant setting removed). -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
