On May 25, 2012, at 2:42 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 5/24/12, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> You haven't looked at the most important problem of that approach
>> - code bloat.
> 
> Are you claiming that the size of the binary is more important than
> run-time performance, type safety, and source code size?

I just look at it as a nice commoning problem in search of a nice solution.

Reply via email to