On Mon, 6 Nov 2023, Tamar Christina wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> This finishes wiring that didn't fit in any of the other patches.
> Essentially just adding related changes so peeling for early break works.
> 
> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
> 
> Ok for master?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tamar
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>       * tree-vect-loop-manip.cc (vect_set_loop_condition_normal,
>       vect_do_peeling): Support early breaks.
>       * tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_need_peeling_or_partial_vectors_p): Likewise.
>       * tree-vectorizer.cc (pass_vectorize::execute): Check all exits.
> 
> --- inline copy of patch -- 
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
> index 
> eef2bb50c1505f5cf802d5d80300affc2cbe69f6..9c1405d79fd8fe8689007df3b7605b7a3d3ecdd7
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
> @@ -1187,7 +1187,7 @@ vect_set_loop_condition_partial_vectors_avx512 (class 
> loop *loop,
>     loop handles exactly VF scalars per iteration.  */
>  
>  static gcond *
> -vect_set_loop_condition_normal (loop_vec_info /* loop_vinfo */, edge 
> exit_edge,
> +vect_set_loop_condition_normal (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo, edge exit_edge,
>                               class loop *loop, tree niters, tree step,
>                               tree final_iv, bool niters_maybe_zero,
>                               gimple_stmt_iterator loop_cond_gsi)
> @@ -1296,7 +1296,8 @@ vect_set_loop_condition_normal (loop_vec_info /* 
> loop_vinfo */, edge exit_edge,
>    gsi_insert_before (&loop_cond_gsi, cond_stmt, GSI_SAME_STMT);
>  
>    /* Record the number of latch iterations.  */
> -  if (limit == niters)
> +  if (limit == niters
> +      || LOOP_VINFO_EARLY_BREAKS (loop_vinfo))
>      /* Case A: the loop iterates NITERS times.  Subtract one to get the
>         latch count.  */
>      loop->nb_iterations = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niters_type, niters,
> @@ -3242,6 +3243,16 @@ vect_do_peeling (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo, tree 
> niters, tree nitersm1,
>      bound_epilog += vf - 1;
>    if (LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS (loop_vinfo))
>      bound_epilog += 1;
> +
> +  /* For early breaks the scalar loop needs to execute at most VF times
> +     to find the element that caused the break.  */
> +  if (LOOP_VINFO_EARLY_BREAKS (loop_vinfo))
> +    {
> +      bound_epilog = vf;
> +      /* Force a scalar epilogue as we can't vectorize the index finding.  */
> +      vect_epilogues = false;

This is originally initialized with

  bool vect_epilogues = loop_vinfo->epilogue_vinfos.length () > 0;

so I think we should avoid filling that with LOOP_VINFO_EARLY_BREAKS
rather than fixing up after the fact?  That is in vect_analyze_loop
adjust

  /* Only vectorize epilogues if PARAM_VECT_EPILOGUES_NOMASK is
     enabled, SIMDUID is not set, it is the innermost loop and we have
     either already found the loop's SIMDLEN or there was no SIMDLEN to
     begin with.
     TODO: Enable epilogue vectorization for loops with SIMDUID set.  */
  bool vect_epilogues = (!simdlen
                         && loop->inner == NULL
                         && param_vect_epilogues_nomask
                         && LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_NITER 
(first_loop_vinfo)
                         && !loop->simduid);

and add !LOOP_VINFO_EARLY_BREAKS?

> +    }
> +
>    bool epilog_peeling = maybe_ne (bound_epilog, 0U);
>    poly_uint64 bound_scalar = bound_epilog;
>  
> @@ -3376,14 +3387,23 @@ vect_do_peeling (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo, tree 
> niters, tree nitersm1,
>                                 bound_prolog + bound_epilog)
>                     : (!LOOP_REQUIRES_VERSIONING (loop_vinfo)
>                        || vect_epilogues));
> +
> +  /* We only support early break vectorization on known bounds at this time.
> +     This means that if the vector loop can't be entered then we won't 
> generate
> +     it at all.  So for now force skip_vector off because the additional 
> control
> +     flow messes with the BB exits and we've already analyzed them.  */
> + skip_vector = skip_vector && !LOOP_VINFO_EARLY_BREAKS (loop_vinfo);
> +

  bool skip_vector = (LOOP_VINFO_NITERS_KNOWN_P (loop_vinfo)
                      ? maybe_lt (LOOP_VINFO_INT_NITERS (loop_vinfo),
                                  bound_prolog + bound_epilog)
                      : (!LOOP_REQUIRES_VERSIONING (loop_vinfo) 
                         || vect_epilogues));

to me that looks like

  gcc_assert (!skip_vector || !LOOP_VINFO_EARLY_BREAKS (loop_vinfo));

should work?  You are basically relying on cost modeling rejecting
vectorization that doesn't enter the vector loop.

>    /* Epilog loop must be executed if the number of iterations for epilog
>       loop is known at compile time, otherwise we need to add a check at
>       the end of vector loop and skip to the end of epilog loop.  */
>    bool skip_epilog = (prolog_peeling < 0
>                     || !LOOP_VINFO_NITERS_KNOWN_P (loop_vinfo)
>                     || !vf.is_constant ());
> -  /* PEELING_FOR_GAPS is special because epilog loop must be executed.  */
> -  if (LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS (loop_vinfo))
> +  /* PEELING_FOR_GAPS and peeling for early breaks are special because epilog
> +     loop must be executed.  */
> +  if (LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS (loop_vinfo)
> +      || LOOP_VINFO_EARLY_BREAKS (loop_vinfo))
>      skip_epilog = false;
>  
>    class loop *scalar_loop = LOOP_VINFO_SCALAR_LOOP (loop_vinfo);
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> index 
> 55d6aee3d29151e6b528f6fdde15c693e5bdd847..51a054c5b035ac80dfbbf3b5ba2f6da82fda91f6
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> @@ -1236,6 +1236,14 @@ vect_need_peeling_or_partial_vectors_p (loop_vec_info 
> loop_vinfo)
>      th = LOOP_VINFO_COST_MODEL_THRESHOLD (LOOP_VINFO_ORIG_LOOP_INFO
>                                         (loop_vinfo));
>  
> +  /* When we have multiple exits and VF is unknown, we must require partial
> +     vectors because the loop bounds is not a minimum but a maximum.  That 
> is to
> +     say we cannot unpredicate the main loop unless we peel or use partial
> +     vectors in the epilogue.  */
> +  if (LOOP_VINFO_EARLY_BREAKS (loop_vinfo)
> +      && !LOOP_VINFO_VECT_FACTOR (loop_vinfo).is_constant ())
> +    return true;
> +

I don't quite understand the !.is_constant (), early breaks always
require peeling?

>    if (LOOP_VINFO_NITERS_KNOWN_P (loop_vinfo)
>        && LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_ALIGNMENT (loop_vinfo) >= 0)
>      {
> @@ -3149,7 +3157,8 @@ start_over:
>  
>    /* If an epilogue loop is required make sure we can create one.  */
>    if (LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS (loop_vinfo)
> -      || LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_NITER (loop_vinfo))
> +      || LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_NITER (loop_vinfo)
> +      || LOOP_VINFO_EARLY_BREAKS (loop_vinfo))
>      {
>        if (dump_enabled_p ())
>          dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location, "epilog loop required\n");
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vectorizer.cc b/gcc/tree-vectorizer.cc
> index 
> d97e2b54c25ac60378935392aa7b73476efed74b..8b495fc7ca137109fc0097c77837233c660e032a
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vectorizer.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vectorizer.cc
> @@ -1381,7 +1381,9 @@ pass_vectorize::execute (function *fun)
>        predicates that need to be shared for optimal predicate usage.
>        However reassoc will re-order them and prevent CSE from working
>        as it should.  CSE only the loop body, not the entry.  */
> -      bitmap_set_bit (exit_bbs, single_exit (loop)->dest->index);
> +      auto_vec<edge> exits = get_loop_exit_edges (loop);
> +      for (edge exit : exits)
> +     bitmap_set_bit (exit_bbs, exit->dest->index);
>  
>        edge entry = EDGE_PRED (loop_preheader_edge (loop)->src, 0);
>        do_rpo_vn (fun, entry, exit_bbs);

Otherwise OK.

Richard.

Reply via email to