* Jeff Law: > Anyway, this test was the one I was most concerned about. Basically > we're testing that on a !dfp target that the builtins are not available. > It expects a warning, but gets an error by default now. I just > changed the test to use -fpermissive, so that the test behaves as it did > previously.
In these ambiguous cases, I cloned tests into -fpermissive and error variants. This might be appropriate here as well (or I should remove the clones again if those are the wrong thing to do).
