On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:15:26PM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:11:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Marek Polacek: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 10:56:36AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > >> --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > >> +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > >> @@ -6183,6 +6183,7 @@ that have their own flag: > > >> @gccoptlist{ > > >> -Wimplicit-function-declaration @r{(C)} > > >> -Wimplicit-int @r{(C)} > > >> +-Wincompatible-pointer-types @r{(C)} > > >> -Wint-conversion @r{(C)} > > >> -Wnarrowing @r{(C++)} > > >> -Wreturn-mismatch @r{(C)} > > > > > > BTW, should the C ones mention Objective-C as well? > > > > Isn't there Objective-C++ as well? I assumed it applied to both > > dialects. > > I think we usually spell both, if they apply. But you can leave it as it is.
Seems we use (C and Objective-C only) (40 times) in preference to (C only) (4 times), (C++ and Objective-C++ only) (61 times) in preference to (6 times), but (C and C++ only) (5 times) and never all 4 languages, even when I think it is very likely some switch would be C only, C++ only or C and C++ only. And (C) is used just for Copyright ;) Jakub