Hi!
Given that the s390 backend defines pretty much the same target hook
as rs6000, I believe it suffers (at least when using -mvx?) the same
problem as rs6000, though admittedly this is so far completely
untested.
Ok for trunk if it passes bootstrap/regtest there?
2023-11-29 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR target/112725
* config/s390/s390.cc (s390_invalid_arg_for_unprototyped_fn): Return
NULL for __builtin_classify_type calls with vector arguments.
--- gcc/config/s390/s390.cc.jj 2023-11-27 17:34:25.684287136 +0100
+++ gcc/config/s390/s390.cc 2023-11-29 09:41:08.569491077 +0100
@@ -12650,7 +12650,8 @@ s390_invalid_arg_for_unprototyped_fn (co
&& VECTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (val))
&& (funcdecl == NULL_TREE
|| (TREE_CODE (funcdecl) == FUNCTION_DECL
- && DECL_BUILT_IN_CLASS (funcdecl) != BUILT_IN_MD)))
+ && DECL_BUILT_IN_CLASS (funcdecl) != BUILT_IN_MD
+ && !fndecl_built_in_p (funcdecl, BUILT_IN_CLASSIFY_TYPE))))
? N_("vector argument passed to unprototyped function")
: NULL);
}
Jakub
