Hello,
Le 23/11/2023 à 22:59, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
Dear all,
the PR is about a redundant obsolescence warning for COMMON when
a symbols appears in the scope of a submodule. As we did not warn
for use-associated symbols, it seemed natural to extend this to
symbols that are used in a submodule. Or am I missing anything?
Regtests cleanly on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
Yes, looks good. Obvious I'm tempted to say.
The PR is marked as a regression (the warning appeared in gcc-9).
It looks simple enough for backporting, or does anybody see any
risk here?
No, you can go ahead.
Thanks
Mikael
