Le 22/11/2023 à 21:36, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
Hi Mikael!

On 11/22/23 10:36, Mikael Morin wrote:
(...)

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/error.cc b/gcc/fortran/error.cc
index 2ac51e95e4d..be715b50469 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/error.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/error.cc
@@ -980,7 +980,11 @@ char const*
 notify_std_msg(int std)
 {

-  if (std & GFC_STD_F2018_DEL)
+  if (std & GFC_STD_F2023_DEL)
+    return _("Fortran 2023 deleted feature:");

As there are officially no deleted feature in f2023, maybe use a
slightly different wording?  Say "Not allowed in fortran 2023" or
"forbidden in Fortran 2023" or similar?

+  else if (std & GFC_STD_F2023)
+    return _("Fortran 2023:");
+  else if (std & GFC_STD_F2018_DEL)
     return _("Fortran 2018 deleted feature:");
   else if (std & GFC_STD_F2018_OBS)
     return _("Fortran 2018 obsolescent feature:");

I skimmed over existing error messages, and since "forbidden" did
not show up and since "Not allowed" exists but not at the beginning
of a message, I found that

"Prohibited in Fortran 2023"

appeared to be a good alternative.

Not being a native speaker, I hope that someone speaks up if this
is not appropriate.  And since I do not explicitly verify that part
in the testcase, it can be changed.

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/libgfortran.h b/gcc/fortran/libgfortran.h
index bdddb317ab0..af7a170c2b1 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/libgfortran.h
+++ b/gcc/fortran/libgfortran.h
@@ -19,9 +19,10 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see


 /* Flags to specify which standard/extension contains a feature.
-   Note that no features were obsoleted nor deleted in F2003 nor in
F2023.
+   Note that no features were obsoleted nor deleted in F2003.

I think we can add a comment that F2023 has no deleted feature, but some
more stringent restrictions in f2023 forbid some previously valid code.

    Please remember to keep those definitions in sync with
    gfortran.texi.  */
+#define GFC_STD_F2023_DEL    (1<<13)    /* Deleted in F2023.  */
 #define GFC_STD_F2023        (1<<12)    /* New in F2023.  */
 #define GFC_STD_F2018_DEL    (1<<11)    /* Deleted in F2018.  */
 #define GFC_STD_F2018_OBS    (1<<10)    /* Obsolescent in F2018.  */
@@ -41,12 +42,13 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
  * are allowed with a certain -std option.  */
 #define GFC_STD_OPT_F95        (GFC_STD_F77 | GFC_STD_F95 |
GFC_STD_F95_OBS  \
                 | GFC_STD_F2008_OBS | GFC_STD_F2018_OBS \
-                | GFC_STD_F2018_DEL)
+                | GFC_STD_F2018_DEL | GFC_STD_F2023_DEL)
 #define GFC_STD_OPT_F03        (GFC_STD_OPT_F95 | GFC_STD_F2003)
 #define GFC_STD_OPT_F08        (GFC_STD_OPT_F03 | GFC_STD_F2008)
 #define GFC_STD_OPT_F18        ((GFC_STD_OPT_F08 | GFC_STD_F2018) \
                 & (~GFC_STD_F2018_DEL))
F03, F08 and F18 should have GFC_STD_F2023_DEL (and also F03 and F08
should have GFC_STD_F2018_DEL).

Well, these macros do an incremental bitwise-or, so the bit representing
GFC_STD_F2023_DEL is included everywhere.  I also ran the testcases with
different -std= options to check.

Ah, yes.  I confused the GFC_STD_OPT* values with the GFC_STD_* ones.

OK with this fixed (and the previous comments as you wish), if Steve has
no more comments.

Thanks for the patch.



If there are no further comments, I will commit once I am able to
fully build again with --disable-bootstrap and -march=native ...

Thanks,
Harald

Thanks again.

Reply via email to