On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 16:23 +0800, chenglulu wrote:
> I tested it and it was fine. I never knew this could be used like
> this.

I remember when I wrote r13-3920 I tried this but failed.  Maybe
something has been improved in machine description parser, or perhaps I
just did some stupid thing that time...

> Thank you!
> 
> 在 2023/11/20 上午8:47, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> > No functional change, just a cleanup.
> > 
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > 
> >     * config/loongarch/loongarch.md (lrint_allow_inexact):
> > Remove.
> >     (<lrint_pattern><ANYF:mode><ANYFI:mode>2): Check if <LRINT>
> >     == UNSPEC_FTINT instead of <lrint_allow_inexact>.
> > ---
> >   gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md | 5 +----
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
> > b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
> > index 78ed63f2132..1e019815451 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
> > +++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
> > @@ -585,9 +585,6 @@ (define_int_attr lrint_pattern [(UNSPEC_FTINT
> > "lrint")
> >   (define_int_attr lrint_submenmonic [(UNSPEC_FTINT "")
> >                                 (UNSPEC_FTINTRM "rm")
> >                                 (UNSPEC_FTINTRP "rp")])
> > -(define_int_attr lrint_allow_inexact [(UNSPEC_FTINT "1")
> > -                                 (UNSPEC_FTINTRM "0")
> > -                                 (UNSPEC_FTINTRP "0")])
> >   
> >   ;; Iterator and attributes for bytepick.d
> >   (define_int_iterator bytepick_w_ashift_amount [8 16 24])
> > @@ -2384,7 +2381,7 @@ (define_insn
> > "<lrint_pattern><ANYF:mode><ANYFI:mode>2"
> >     (unspec:ANYFI [(match_operand:ANYF 1 "register_operand"
> > "f")]
> >                   LRINT))]
> >     "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT &&
> > -   (<lrint_allow_inexact>
> > +   (<LRINT> == UNSPEC_FTINT
> >       || flag_fp_int_builtin_inexact
> >       || !flag_trapping_math)"
> >     "ftint<lrint_submenmonic>.<ANYFI:ifmt>.<ANYF:fmt> %0,%1"
> 

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University

Reply via email to