On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 16:23 +0800, chenglulu wrote: > I tested it and it was fine. I never knew this could be used like > this.
I remember when I wrote r13-3920 I tried this but failed. Maybe something has been improved in machine description parser, or perhaps I just did some stupid thing that time... > Thank you! > > 在 2023/11/20 上午8:47, Xi Ruoyao 写道: > > No functional change, just a cleanup. > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * config/loongarch/loongarch.md (lrint_allow_inexact): > > Remove. > > (<lrint_pattern><ANYF:mode><ANYFI:mode>2): Check if <LRINT> > > == UNSPEC_FTINT instead of <lrint_allow_inexact>. > > --- > > gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md | 5 +---- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md > > b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md > > index 78ed63f2132..1e019815451 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md > > +++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md > > @@ -585,9 +585,6 @@ (define_int_attr lrint_pattern [(UNSPEC_FTINT > > "lrint") > > (define_int_attr lrint_submenmonic [(UNSPEC_FTINT "") > > (UNSPEC_FTINTRM "rm") > > (UNSPEC_FTINTRP "rp")]) > > -(define_int_attr lrint_allow_inexact [(UNSPEC_FTINT "1") > > - (UNSPEC_FTINTRM "0") > > - (UNSPEC_FTINTRP "0")]) > > > > ;; Iterator and attributes for bytepick.d > > (define_int_iterator bytepick_w_ashift_amount [8 16 24]) > > @@ -2384,7 +2381,7 @@ (define_insn > > "<lrint_pattern><ANYF:mode><ANYFI:mode>2" > > (unspec:ANYFI [(match_operand:ANYF 1 "register_operand" > > "f")] > > LRINT))] > > "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && > > - (<lrint_allow_inexact> > > + (<LRINT> == UNSPEC_FTINT > > || flag_fp_int_builtin_inexact > > || !flag_trapping_math)" > > "ftint<lrint_submenmonic>.<ANYFI:ifmt>.<ANYF:fmt> %0,%1" > -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University