On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 11:04 +0800, Guo Jie wrote: > For the following immediate load operation in > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/imm-load1.c: > > long long r = 0x0101010101010101; > > Before this patch: > > lu12i.w $r15,16842752>>12 > ori $r15,$r15,257 > lu32i.d $r15,0x1010100000000>>32 > lu52i.d $r15,$r15,0x100000000000000>>52 > > After this patch: > > lu12i.w $r15,16842752>>12 > ori $r15,$r15,257 > bstrins.d $r15,$r15,63,32 > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/loongarch/loongarch.cc > (enum loongarch_load_imm_method): Add new method. > (loongarch_build_integer): Add relevant implementations for > new method. > (loongarch_move_integer): Ditto. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.target/loongarch/imm-load1.c: Change old check. > > --- > Update in v2: > 1. Correct the format of ChangeLog. > 2. Avoid left shift of negative value in loongarch_build_integer.
LGTM. > > --- > gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc | 22 ++++++++++++++++++- > .../gcc.target/loongarch/imm-load1.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc > b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc > index d05743bec87..f95507e2348 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc > @@ -142,12 +142,16 @@ struct loongarch_address_info > > METHOD_LU52I: > Load 52-63 bit of the immediate number. > + > + METHOD_MIRROR: > + Copy 0-31 bit of the immediate number to 32-63bit. > */ > enum loongarch_load_imm_method > { > METHOD_NORMAL, > METHOD_LU32I, > - METHOD_LU52I > + METHOD_LU52I, > + METHOD_MIRROR > }; > > struct loongarch_integer_op > @@ -1556,11 +1560,23 @@ loongarch_build_integer (struct loongarch_integer_op > *codes, > > int sign31 = (value & (HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << 31)) >> 31; > int sign51 = (value & (HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << 51)) >> 51; > + > + uint32_t hival = (uint32_t) (value >> 32); > + uint32_t loval = (uint32_t) value; > + > /* Determine whether the upper 32 bits are sign-extended from the lower > 32 bits. If it is, the instructions to load the high order can be > ommitted. */ > if (lu32i[sign31] && lu52i[sign31]) > return cost; > + /* If the lower 32 bits are the same as the upper 32 bits, just copy > + the lower 32 bits to the upper 32 bits. */ > + else if (loval == hival) > + { > + codes[cost].method = METHOD_MIRROR; > + codes[cost].curr_value = value; > + return cost + 1; > + } > /* Determine whether bits 32-51 are sign-extended from the lower 32 > bits. If so, directly load 52-63 bits. */ > else if (lu32i[sign31]) > @@ -3230,6 +3246,10 @@ loongarch_move_integer (rtx temp, rtx dest, unsigned > HOST_WIDE_INT value) > gen_rtx_AND (DImode, x, GEN_INT (0xfffffffffffff)), > GEN_INT (codes[i].value)); > break; > + case METHOD_MIRROR: > + gcc_assert (mode == DImode); > + emit_insn (gen_insvdi (x, GEN_INT (32), GEN_INT (32), x)); > + break; > default: > gcc_unreachable (); > } > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/imm-load1.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/imm-load1.c > index 2ff02971239..f64cc2956a3 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/imm-load1.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/imm-load1.c > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ > /* { dg-do compile } */ > /* { dg-options "-mabi=lp64d -O2" } */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "test:.*lu52i\.d.*\n\taddi\.w.*\n\.L2:" } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "test:.*lu52i\.d.*\n\taddi\.w.*\n\.L2:" } > } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "test:.*lu12i\.w.*\n\tbstrins\.d.*\n\.L2:" } > } */ > > > extern long long b[10]; -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University