Fixed on upstream, thanks for reporting, I guess my host GCC is just
too old. It doesn't even not report that bug with -Wall -Wextra..

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:41 PM Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> In file included from 
> /daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20231117/Build/prev-riscv64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/memory:78,
>                  from ../../gcc/system.h:769,
>                  from ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:25:
> In member function 'void std::default_delete<_Tp>::operator()(_Tp*) const 
> [with _Tp = char]',
>     inlined from 'std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::~unique_ptr() [with _Tp = char; 
> _Dp = std::default_delete<char>]' at 
> /daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20231117/Build/prev-riscv64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unique_ptr.h:398:17,
>     inlined from 'bool riscv_process_one_target_attr(char*, location_t, 
> {anonymous}::riscv_target_attr_parser&)' at 
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:274:1,
>     inlined from 'bool riscv_process_target_attr(tree, location_t, 
> gcc_options*)' at ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:346:37:
> /daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20231117/Build/prev-riscv64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unique_ptr.h:93:9:
>  error: 'void operator delete(void*, std::size_t)' called on pointer returned 
> from a mismatched allocation function [-Werror=mismatched-new-delete]
>    93 |         delete __ptr;
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> In function 'bool riscv_process_one_target_attr(char*, location_t, 
> {anonymous}::riscv_target_attr_parser&)',
>     inlined from 'bool riscv_process_target_attr(tree, location_t, 
> gcc_options*)' at ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:346:37:
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:244:42: note: returned from 
> 'void* operator new [](std::size_t)'
>   244 |   std::unique_ptr<char> buf (new char[len]);
>       |                                          ^
> In member function 'void std::default_delete<_Tp>::operator()(_Tp*) const 
> [with _Tp = char]',
>     inlined from 'std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::~unique_ptr() [with _Tp = char; 
> _Dp = std::default_delete<char>]' at 
> /daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20231117/Build/prev-riscv64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unique_ptr.h:398:17,
>     inlined from 'bool riscv_process_target_attr(tree, location_t, 
> gcc_options*)' at ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:361:1:
> /daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20231117/Build/prev-riscv64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unique_ptr.h:93:9:
>  error: 'void operator delete(void*, std::size_t)' called on pointer returned 
> from a mismatched allocation function [-Werror=mismatched-new-delete]
>    93 |         delete __ptr;
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc: In function 'bool 
> riscv_process_target_attr(tree, location_t, gcc_options*)':
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:330:42: note: returned from 
> 'void* operator new [](std::size_t)'
>   330 |   std::unique_ptr<char> buf (new char[len]);
>       |                                          ^
> In member function 'void std::default_delete<_Tp>::operator()(_Tp*) const 
> [with _Tp = char]',
>     inlined from 'std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::~unique_ptr() [with _Tp = char; 
> _Dp = std::default_delete<char>]' at 
> /daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20231117/Build/prev-riscv64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unique_ptr.h:398:17,
>     inlined from 'bool 
> {anonymous}::riscv_target_attr_parser::parse_arch(const char*)' at 
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:140:5,
>     inlined from 'bool 
> {anonymous}::riscv_target_attr_parser::handle_arch(const char*)' at 
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:158:21:
> /daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20231117/Build/prev-riscv64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unique_ptr.h:93:9:
>  error: 'void operator delete(void*, std::size_t)' called on pointer returned 
> from a mismatched allocation function [-Werror=mismatched-new-delete]
>    93 |         delete __ptr;
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> In member function 'bool 
> {anonymous}::riscv_target_attr_parser::parse_arch(const char*)',
>     inlined from 'bool 
> {anonymous}::riscv_target_attr_parser::handle_arch(const char*)' at 
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:158:21:
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:108:46: note: returned from 
> 'void* operator new [](std::size_t)'
>   108 |       std::unique_ptr<char> buf (new char[len]);
>       |                                              ^
> In member function 'void std::default_delete<_Tp>::operator()(_Tp*) const 
> [with _Tp = char]',
>     inlined from 'std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::~unique_ptr() [with _Tp = char; 
> _Dp = std::default_delete<char>]' at 
> /daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20231117/Build/prev-riscv64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unique_ptr.h:398:17,
>     inlined from 'bool 
> {anonymous}::riscv_target_attr_parser::parse_arch(const char*)' at 
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:140:5,
>     inlined from 'bool 
> {anonymous}::riscv_target_attr_parser::handle_arch(const char*)' at 
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:158:21:
> /daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20231117/Build/prev-riscv64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unique_ptr.h:93:9:
>  error: 'void operator delete(void*, std::size_t)' called on pointer returned 
> from a mismatched allocation function [-Werror=mismatched-new-delete]
>    93 |         delete __ptr;
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> In member function 'bool 
> {anonymous}::riscv_target_attr_parser::parse_arch(const char*)',
>     inlined from 'bool 
> {anonymous}::riscv_target_attr_parser::handle_arch(const char*)' at 
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:158:21:
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc:108:46: note: returned from 
> 'void* operator new [](std::size_t)'
>   108 |       std::unique_ptr<char> buf (new char[len]);
>       |                                              ^
> cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[3]: *** [../../gcc/config/riscv/t-riscv:120: riscv-target-attr.o] Error 1
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
> GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
> "And now for something completely different."

Reply via email to