Hi,
On 11/13/23 15:26, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index 1a7bea96c1e..d414cddf4dc 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -5590,6 +5590,24 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_cbz_ok {} {
}
}
+# Return 1 if this is an Arm target which supports the Armv6t2 extensions.
+# This can be either in Arm state or in Thumb state.
+
+proc check_effective_target_arm_arch_v6t2_hw_ok {} {
+ if [check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_ok] {
Why arm_thumb1_ok and not arm_arch_v6t2_ok ?
Thanks,
Christophe
+ return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_movt object {
+ int
+ main (void)
+ {
+ asm ("bfc r0, #1, #2");
+ return 0;
+ }
+ } [add_options_for_arm_arch_v6t2 ""]]
+ } else {
+ return 0
+ }
+}
+
# Return 1 if this is an ARM target where ARMv8-M Security Extensions is
# available.
