On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> RVV didn't explictly enable DIV_POW2 optab but we cen vectorize it.
> We should check pattern recognition instead of explicit pattern check.
But I see
proc check_effective_target_vect_sdiv_pow2_si {} {
return [expr { ([istarget aarch64*-*-*]
&& [check_effective_target_aarch64_sve])
|| ([istarget riscv*-*-*]
&& [check_effective_target_riscv_v]) }]
so if you don't have sdiv_pow2_si then please don't advertise it.
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/vect/vect-sdiv-pow2-1.c: Fix dump check.
>
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-sdiv-pow2-1.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-sdiv-pow2-1.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-sdiv-pow2-1.c
> index 49ecbe216f2..8056c2a6748 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-sdiv-pow2-1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-sdiv-pow2-1.c
> @@ -79,5 +79,5 @@ main (void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {\.DIV_POW2} "vect" { target
> vect_sdiv_pow2_si } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "vect_recog_divmod_pattern: detected" "vect"
> } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loop" 18 "vect" { target
> vect_sdiv_pow2_si } } } */
>
--
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
