On 10/20/23 03:53, Christoph Muellner wrote:
From: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>
The XTheadFMemIdx ISA extension provides additional load and store
instructions for floating-point registers with new addressing modes.
The following memory accesses types are supported:
* load/store: [w,d] (single-precision FP, double-precision FP)
The following addressing modes are supported:
* register offset with additional immediate offset (4 instructions):
flr<type>, fsr<type>
* zero-extended register offset with additional immediate offset
(4 instructions): flur<type>, fsur<type>
These addressing modes are also part of the similar XTheadMemIdx
ISA extension support, whose code is reused and extended to support
floating-point registers.
One challenge that this patch needs to solve are GP registers in FP-mode
(e.g. "(reg:DF a2)"), which cannot be handled by the XTheadFMemIdx
instructions. Such registers are the result of independent
optimizations, which can happen after register allocation.
This patch uses a simple but efficient method to address this:
add a dependency for XTheadMemIdx to XTheadFMemIdx optimizations.
This allows to use the instructions from XTheadMemIdx in case
of such registers.
Or alternately define secondary reloads so that you can get a scratch
register to reload the address into a GPR. Your call on whether or not
to try to implement that. I guess it largely depends on how likely it
is you'll have one extension defined, but not the other.
The added tests ensure that this feature won't regress without notice.
Testing: GCC regression test suite and SPEC CPU 2017 intrate (base&peak).
Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_index_reg_class):
Return GR_REGS for XTheadFMemIdx.
(riscv_regno_ok_for_index_p): Add support for XTheadFMemIdx.
* config/riscv/riscv.h (HARDFP_REG_P): New macro.
* config/riscv/thead.cc (is_fmemidx_mode): New function.
(th_memidx_classify_address_index): Add support for XTheadFMemIdx.
(th_fmemidx_output_index): New function.
(th_output_move): Add support for XTheadFMemIdx.
* config/riscv/thead.md (TH_M_ANYF): New mode iterator.
(TH_M_NOEXTF): Likewise.
(*th_fmemidx_movsf_hardfloat): New INSN.
(*th_fmemidx_movdf_hardfloat_rv64): Likewise.
(*th_fmemidx_I_a): Likewise.
(*th_fmemidx_I_c): Likewise.
(*th_fmemidx_US_a): Likewise.
(*th_fmemidx_US_c): Likewise.
(*th_fmemidx_UZ_a): Likewise.
(*th_fmemidx_UZ_c): Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/xtheadfmemidx-index-update.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/xtheadfmemidx-index-xtheadbb-update.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/xtheadfmemidx-index-xtheadbb.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/xtheadfmemidx-index.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/xtheadfmemidx-uindex-update.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/xtheadfmemidx-uindex-xtheadbb-update.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/xtheadfmemidx-uindex-xtheadbb.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/xtheadfmemidx-uindex.c: New test.
---
Same note as with the prior patch WRT wrapping assembly instructions
when using scan-assembler.
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h
index eb162abcb92..1e9813b4f39 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h
@@ -372,6 +372,8 @@ ASM_MISA_SPEC
((unsigned int) ((int) (REGNO) - GP_REG_FIRST) < GP_REG_NUM)
#define FP_REG_P(REGNO) \
((unsigned int) ((int) (REGNO) - FP_REG_FIRST) < FP_REG_NUM)
+#define HARDFP_REG_P(REGNO) \
+ ((REGNO) >= FP_REG_FIRST && (REGNO) <= FP_REG_LAST)
#define V_REG_P(REGNO) \
((unsigned int) ((int) (REGNO) - V_REG_FIRST) < V_REG_NUM)
#define VL_REG_P(REGNO) ((REGNO) == VL_REGNUM)
@@ -755,6 +768,40 @@ th_memidx_output_index (rtx x, machine_mode mode, bool
load)
return buf;
}
+/* Provide a buffer for a th.flX/th.fluX/th.fsX/th.fsuX instruction
+ for the given MODE. If LOAD is true, a load instruction will be
+ provided (otherwise, a store instruction). If X is not suitable
+ return NULL. */
+
+static const char *
+th_fmemidx_output_index (rtx x, machine_mode mode, bool load)
+{
+ struct riscv_address_info info;
+ static char buf[128] = {0};
Same comment WRT static buffers as in the previous patch.
OK for the trunk after fixing the testcases and potentially adjusting
the static buffer. No need to get another review round, post for for
the archiver and commit.
jeff
