Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Make stack_save_restore_2 more robust

[Jeff Law]

On 10/27/23 11:56, Patrick O'Neill wrote:

GCC recently changed to emit __riscv_restore_5 which causes this
testcase to fail.
This patch updates the regex to be more robust to change by accepting
any number after __riscv_save_ and __riscv_restore_.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/riscv/stack_save_restore_2.c: Accept any number
        after __riscv_save_ and __riscv_restore_.

OK
jeff