On 10/25/23 02:32, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
Ping.
Grüße
Thomas
On 2023-09-12T13:03:28+0200, I wrote:
Hi!
On 2020-04-04T00:00:44+0100, "Maciej W. Rozycki via Gcc-patches"
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
Fix a problem with the libatomic testsuite using a method to determine
the compiler to use resulting in the tool being different from one the
library has been built with, and causing a catastrophic failure from the
lack of a suitable `--sysroot=' option where the `--with-build-sysroot='
configuration option has been used to build the compiler resulting in
the inability to link executables.
Address this problem by providing a DejaGNU configuration file defining
the compiler to use, via the GCC_UNDER_TEST TCL variable, set from $CC
by autoconf, which will have all the required options set for the target
compiler to build executables in the environment configured
As we've found, this is conceptually problematic, as discussed in
<https://inbox.sourceware.org/875y868a4b....@euler.schwinge.homeip.net>
"Consider '--with-build-sysroot=[...]' for target libraries' build-tree testing
(instead of build-time 'CC' etc.)
[PR109951]".
I therefore suggest to apply to libatomic the conceptually same changes
as I've just pushed for libgomp:
<https://inbox.sourceware.org/874jjzzqc2....@euler.schwinge.homeip.net>
"libgomp: Consider '--with-build-sysroot=[...]' for target libraries'
build-tree testing (instead of build-time 'CC'
etc.) [PR91884, PR109951]".
OK to push the attached
"libatomic: Consider '--with-build-sysroot=[...]' for target libraries' build-tree
testing (instead of build-time 'CC' etc.) [PR109951]"?
Also OK.
Jeff
