On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:27 PM Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/20/23 09:53, Ken Matsui wrote:
> > Since RID_MAX soon reaches 255 and all built-in traits are used 
> > approximately
> > once in a C++ translation unit, this patch removes all RID values for 
> > built-in
>
> These two lines are too long; please wrap at 75 columns so they don't go
> over 80 when git log adds 4 spaces at the beginning.
>
> > traits and uses the identifier node to look up the specific trait.  Rather
> > than holding traits as keywords, we set all trait identifiers as cik_trait,
> > which is a new cp_identifier_kind.  As cik_reserved_for_udlit was unused and
> > cp_identifier_kind is 3 bits, we replaced the unused field with the new
> > cik_trait.  Also, the later patch handles a subsequent token to the built-in
> > identifier so that we accept the use of non-function-like built-in trait
> > identifiers.
> >
> >   /* True if this identifier is for any operator name (including
> > -   conversions).  Value 4, 5, 6 or 7.  */
> > +   conversions).  Value 4, 5, or 6.  */
> >   #define IDENTIFIER_ANY_OP_P(NODE)           \
> > -  (IDENTIFIER_KIND_BIT_2 (NODE))
> > +  (IDENTIFIER_KIND_BIT_2 (NODE) && !IDENTIFIER_TRAIT_P (NODE))
> ...
> > +/* True if this identifier is the name of a built-in trait.  */
> > +#define IDENTIFIER_TRAIT_P(NODE)             \
> > +  (IDENTIFIER_KIND_BIT_0 (NODE)                      \
> > +   && IDENTIFIER_KIND_BIT_1 (NODE)           \
> > +   && IDENTIFIER_KIND_BIT_2 (NODE))
>
> The other macros use &, not &&; we might as well stay consistent with
> that pattern.
>

Thank you! Will fix these.

> Jason
>

Reply via email to