Like comment said, this test failed on 64 bytes vector.
Both RVV and GCN has 64 bytes vector.
So it's more reasonable to use vect512.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c: Use vect512.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
index e7573a14933..2dd3d8ee90c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
@@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ void foo ()
/* We want to have the store group split into 4, 2, 4 when using 32byte
vectors.
Unfortunately it does not work when 64-byte vectors are available. */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "from scalars" "slp2" { xfail amdgcn-*-* }
} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "from scalars" "slp2" { xfail vect512 } } }
*/
--
2.36.3
