Committed, thanks Jeff.
Pan
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 9:24 PM
To: Juzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: rguent...@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V Regression: Fix FAIL of pr65947-8.c for RVV
On 10/10/23 06:55, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> This test is testing fold_extract_last pattern so it's more reasonable use
> vect_fold_extract_last instead of specifying targets.
>
> This is the vect_fold_extract_last property:
> proc check_effective_target_vect_fold_extract_last { } {
> return [expr { [check_effective_target_aarch64_sve]
> || [istarget amdgcn*-*-*]
> || [check_effective_target_riscv_v] }]
> }
>
> include ARM SVE/GCN/RVV.
>
> It perfectly matches what we want and more reasonable, better maintainment.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-8.c: Use vect_fold_extract_last.
OK
jeff
