This patch fixes following 2 FAILs in RVV regression since the check is not accurate.
It's inspired by Robin's previous patch: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/dde89b9e-49a0-d70b-0906-fb3022cac...@gmail.com/ gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-7.c: Adjust regex pattern. * gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-vect-iv-3.c: Ditto. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-7.c | 2 +- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-vect-iv-3.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-7.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-7.c index 543ee98b5a4..058d1d2db2d 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-7.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-7.c @@ -77,4 +77,4 @@ int main (void) } /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "OUTER LOOP VECTORIZED." 1 "vect" { target vect_widen_mult_hi_to_si } } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vect_recog_widen_mult_pattern: detected" 1 "vect" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vect_recog_widen_mult_pattern: detected(?:(?!failed)(?!Re-trying).)*succeeded" 1 "vect" } } */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-vect-iv-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-vect-iv-3.c index 7049e4936b9..6f2b2210b11 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-vect-iv-3.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-vect-iv-3.c @@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ unsigned int main1 () } /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" { target vect_widen_sum_hi_to_si } } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vect_recog_widen_sum_pattern: detected" 1 "vect" { target vect_widen_sum_hi_to_si } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vect_recog_widen_sum_pattern: detected(?:(?!failed)(?!Re-trying).)*succeeded" 1 "vect" { target vect_widen_sum_hi_to_si } } } */ -- 2.36.3
