On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 16:26 +0800, chenglulu wrote:
> LGTM!
>
> Thank you for your modification!
Pushed r14-4250.
> 在 2023/9/25 下午4:13, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * doc/invoke.texi: Update -m[no-]explicit-relocs for r14-4160.
> > ---
> >
> > I've not regtested this as it's only a doc change. Ok for trunk?
> >
> > gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> > index ba7984bcb7e..146b40414b0 100644
> > --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> > @@ -26159,10 +26159,12 @@ The default code model is @code{normal}.
> > @itemx -mno-explicit-relocs
> > Use or do not use assembler relocation operators when dealing with
> > symbolic
> > addresses. The alternative is to use assembler macros instead, which may
> > -limit optimization. The default value for the option is determined during
> > -GCC build-time by detecting corresponding assembler support:
> > -@code{-mexplicit-relocs} if said support is present,
> > -@code{-mno-explicit-relocs} otherwise. This option is mostly useful for
> > +limit instruction scheduling but allow linker relaxation. The default
> > +value for the option is determined during GCC build-time by detecting
> > +corresponding assembler support:
> > +@code{-mno-explicit-relocs} if the assembler supports relaxation or it
> > +does not support relocation operators at all,
> > +@code{-mexplicit-relocs} otherwise. This option is mostly useful for
> > debugging, or interoperation with assemblers different from the build-time
> > one.
> >
>
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
