Lewis Hyatt via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> Hello-
>
> This fixes an old PR, bootstrap + regtest on x86-64 Linux. Please let me know 
> if it's ok? Thanks!
>
> -Lewis
>
> -- >8 --
>
> As noted in the PR, GCC will segfault if a file name is first seen in a
> linemarker directive, and then later seen in a normal #include.  This is
> because the fake include process adds the file to the cache with a null PATH
> member. The normal #include finds this file in the cache and then attempts
> to use the null PATH.  Resolve by adding the file to the cache with a unique
> starting directory, so that the fake entry will only be found by a
> subsequent fake include, not by a real one.
>
> libcpp/ChangeLog:
>
>       PR preprocessor/61474
>       * files.cc (_cpp_find_file): Set DONT_READ to TRUE for fake
>       include files.
>       (_cpp_fake_include): Pass a unique cpp_dir* address so
>       the fake file will not be found when looked up for real.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>       PR preprocessor/61474
>       * c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474-2.h: New test.
>       * c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474.c: New test.
>       * c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474.h: New test.

Neat fix!  I don't know this code very well, but I agree it looks
correct.  OK if no-one objects in 24 hours.

Thanks,
Richard

> ---
>  libcpp/files.cc                            | 11 +++++++++--
>  gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474-2.h |  1 +
>  gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474.c   |  5 +++++
>  gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474.h   |  6 ++++++
>  4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474-2.h
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474.h
>
> diff --git a/libcpp/files.cc b/libcpp/files.cc
> index 43a8894b7de..27301d79fa4 100644
> --- a/libcpp/files.cc
> +++ b/libcpp/files.cc
> @@ -541,7 +541,9 @@ _cpp_find_file (cpp_reader *pfile, const char *fname, 
> cpp_dir *start_dir,
>      = (kind == _cpp_FFK_PRE_INCLUDE
>         || (pfile->buffer && pfile->buffer->file->implicit_preinclude));
>  
> -  if (kind != _cpp_FFK_FAKE)
> +  if (kind == _cpp_FFK_FAKE)
> +    file->dont_read = true;
> +  else
>      /* Try each path in the include chain.  */
>      for (;;)
>        {
> @@ -1490,7 +1492,12 @@ cpp_clear_file_cache (cpp_reader *pfile)
>  void
>  _cpp_fake_include (cpp_reader *pfile, const char *fname)
>  {
> -  _cpp_find_file (pfile, fname, pfile->buffer->file->dir, 0, _cpp_FFK_FAKE, 
> 0);
> +  /* It does not matter what are the contents of fake_source_dir, it will 
> never
> +     be inspected; we just use its address to uniquely signify that this file
> +     was added as a fake include, so a later call to _cpp_find_file (to 
> include
> +     the file for real) won't find the fake one in the hash table.  */
> +  static cpp_dir fake_source_dir;
> +  _cpp_find_file (pfile, fname, &fake_source_dir, 0, _cpp_FFK_FAKE, 0);
>  }
>  
>  /* Not everyone who wants to set system-header-ness on a buffer can
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474-2.h 
> b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474-2.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..6f70f09beec
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474-2.h
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +#pragma once
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..f835a40fc7a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +/* { dg-do preprocess } */
> +#include "pr61474.h"
> +/* Make sure that the file can be included for real, after it was
> +   fake-included by the linemarker directives in pr61474.h.  */
> +#include "pr61474-2.h"
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474.h 
> b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..d9e8c3a1fec
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr61474.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +/* Create a fake include for pr61474-2.h and exercise looking it up.  */
> +/* Use #pragma once to check also that the fake-include entry in the file
> +   cache does not cause a problem in libcpp/files.cc:has_unique_contents().  
> */
> +#pragma once
> +# 1 "pr61474-2.h" 1
> +# 2 "pr61474-2.h" 1

Reply via email to