Hi!

On 2015-12-15T15:49:16-0500, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote:
> this patch uses reg_names array to emit register names, rather than have
> knowledge scattered throughout the PTX backend.  Also, converted
> write_fn_proto_from_insn to use (renamed) write_arg_mode and (new)
> write_return_mode.

Pushed to master branch commit 3049501db3a31d10c84fc42b306e29b6fe68330f
"Fix up 'g++.dg/abi/nvptx-ptrmem1.C'", see attached.


Grüße
 Thomas


-----------------
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 
München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas 
Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht 
München, HRB 106955
>From 3049501db3a31d10c84fc42b306e29b6fe68330f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 16:34:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix up 'g++.dg/abi/nvptx-ptrmem1.C'

..., which shortly after its inception in
commit 44eba92d0a0594bda5b53fcb3c8f84f164c653b6 (Subversion r231628)
"[PTX] parameters and return values" was forgotten to be updated in next day's
commit 1f0659546bcf5b95c3263cdc73149f6c2a05ebe1 (Subversion r231663)
"[PTX] more register cleanups".  Fix it up now, as obvious, for the current
state of things.

	gcc/testsuite/
	* g++.dg/abi/nvptx-ptrmem1.C: Fix up.
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/nvptx-ptrmem1.C | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/nvptx-ptrmem1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/nvptx-ptrmem1.C
index 08ffd7e373e..0c57f29fa21 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/nvptx-ptrmem1.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/nvptx-ptrmem1.C
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ struct A{};
 typedef int A::*pmd;
 typedef void (A::*pmf) ();
 
-// { dg-final { scan-assembler ".extern .func \\(.param.u64 %out_retval\\) _Z8dcl_rpmdv;" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler ".extern .func \\(.param.u64 %value_out\\) _Z8dcl_rpmdv;" } }
 pmd dcl_rpmd ();
 
 // { dg-final { scan-assembler ".extern .func _Z8dcl_rpmfv \\(.param.u64 %in_ar0\\);" } }
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ void test_1 ()
   dcl_apmf (0);
 }
 
-// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times ".visible .func \\(.param.u64 %out_retval\\) _Z8dfn_rpmdv(?:;|\[\r\n\]+\{)" 2 } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times ".visible .func \\(.param.u64 %value_out\\) _Z8dfn_rpmdv(?:;|\[\r\n\]+\{)" 2 } }
 pmd dfn_rpmd ()
 {
   return 0;
-- 
2.34.1

Reply via email to