PING: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00383.html
And on a general note, what is the opinion of the C/C++ maintainers about tracking the original source code more faithfully than currently done? Cheers, Manuel. On 5 May 2012 11:06, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote: > This patch adds the ability to see in shorten_compare that a constant > comes from an enumeral type. It does so by using in both C/C++ the > existing infrastructure from the C FE (c_expr). Currently, only the C > FE carries down the correct information to avoid warning, so C++ still > warns. However, this patch also opens the possibility to pass down > this info in the C++ FE using c_expr, and avoid warning in a follow up > patch. > > Bootstrapped and regression tested. This is a proof-of-concept, so I > don't provide a changelog or update the comments of new/existing > functions. > > Comments? Is this approach OK? > > Cheers, > > Manuel.
