On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Tsukasa OI wrote:
> On 2023/08/29 8:09, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/9/23 00:11, Tsukasa OI via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >>> From: Tsukasa OI <research_tra...@irq.a4lg.com>
> >>>
> >>> This built-in does not imply the 'Xgnuzihintpausestate' extension.
> >>> It does not change architectural state (because all HINTs are prohibited
> >>> from doing that).
> >>>
> >>> gcc/ChangeLog:
> >>>
> >>> * doc/extend.texi: Fix the description of __builtin_riscv_pause.
> >> I've pushed this to the trunk.
> >
> > I randomly noticed a typo: "hart", perhaps for "part"?
> > Not sure though.
> >
> > brgds, H-P
> >
>
> Hi H-P,
>
> As Jeff mentioned you, the word "hart" in the RISC-V world means a
> HARdware Thread and commonly used to represent a hardware-based unit of
> execution.
Thanks for the explanation. Perhaps it's worth telling general
readers of the document that it's a term, by simply decorating
"hart" like @samp{hart} or adding the text "(hardware thread)"?
It's the only grep-hit in the document at this time.
brgds, H-P
