I would prefer to decouple the shrink-wrap part by checking flag_shrink_wrap, I mean let disable zcmp code gen if flag_shrink_wrap is true for now, and a follow up patch series with shrink-wrap.[cc|h] changes?
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 3:48 PM Fei Gao <gao...@eswincomputing.com> wrote: > > The first is a helper patch to allow targets to check shrink-wrap-separate > enabled or not. > The second is zcmp extension implementation in RISC-V. > > Fei Gao (2): > allow target to check shrink-wrap-separate enabled or not > support cm.push cm.pop cm.popret in zcmp and resolve confilct with > shrink-wrap-separate > > gcc/config/riscv/iterators.md | 15 + > gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md | 96 ++ > gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h | 2 + > gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 455 ++++++- > gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h | 25 + > gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md | 2 + > gcc/config/riscv/zc.md | 1042 +++++++++++++++++ > gcc/shrink-wrap.cc | 25 +- > gcc/shrink-wrap.h | 1 + > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rv32e_zcmp.c | 256 ++++ > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rv32i_zcmp.c | 256 ++++ > .../gcc.target/riscv/zcmp_push_fpr.c | 34 + > .../riscv/zcmp_shrink_wrap_separate.c | 93 ++ > .../riscv/zcmp_shrink_wrap_separate2.c | 93 ++ > .../gcc.target/riscv/zcmp_stack_alignment.c | 24 + > 15 files changed, 2357 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/config/riscv/zc.md > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rv32e_zcmp.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rv32i_zcmp.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zcmp_push_fpr.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zcmp_shrink_wrap_separate.c > create mode 100644 > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zcmp_shrink_wrap_separate2.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zcmp_stack_alignment.c > > -- > 2.17.1 >
