H8/300 cpus have a larger-than-64k address space, despite 16-bit pointers. OK to apply? Ok for 4.7 branch?
See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231 * config/h8300/h8300.h (DWARF2_ADDR_SIZE): Define as 4 bytes. Index: h8300.h =================================================================== --- h8300.h (revision 187362) +++ h8300.h (working copy) @@ -126,12 +126,13 @@ extern const char * const *h8_reg_names; /* The return address is pushed on the stack. */ #define INCOMING_RETURN_ADDR_RTX gen_rtx_MEM (Pmode, gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, STACK_POINTER_REGNUM)) #define INCOMING_FRAME_SP_OFFSET (POINTER_SIZE / 8) #define DWARF_CIE_DATA_ALIGNMENT 2 +#define DWARF2_ADDR_SIZE 4 /* Define this if addresses of constant functions shouldn't be put through pseudo regs where they can be cse'd. Desirable on machines where ordinary constants are expensive but a CALL with constant address is cheap.
