On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, May 08, 2012 11:59:34 Richard Earnshaw wrote: >> On 08/05/12 10:04, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> > On Tuesday, May 08, 2012 10:43:14 Richard Guenther wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:11 PM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> I am preparing to update GLIBC longlong.h from GCC. This patch >> >>> updates GCC longlong.h to use a URL instead of an FSF postal address >> >>> and replace spaces with tab. OK to install? >> >>> >> >>> Since I'd like to simply copy longlong.h from GCC release branch to >> >>> GLIBC, Is this also OK for 4.7 branch? >> >> >> >> Why? Does it fix anything there? >> > >> > It makes sharing the file between gcc and glibc easier, >> > >> > Andreas >> >> Why should glibc be depending on the GCC release branch? Sounds like >> the tail wagging the dog. > > Ah, you discuss the release branch ;) Let HJ defend that one. > > >> Changing this file has quite a high potential for introducing >> regressions. I don't think we should risk that on the release branch. > > It's only whitespace IMO. I'm arguing for the trunk to take the change, >
I will take whatever I can get. Ian, is this OK for trunk? Thanks. -- H.J.
