On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 4:38 AM Kewen.Lin <li...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > on 2023/8/15 17:13, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> OK, fair enough. So the idea is: see where we end up and then try to > >>> improve/factor the APIs in a less peephole way? > >> > >> Yeah, I think that's the only good way forward. > > > > OK, no objection from me. Sorry for holding the patch up. > > This hasn't been approved yet (although the patch on VMAT_LOAD_STORE_LANES > was), so it wasn't held up and thanks for sharing your thoughts and making > it get attention. :) > > From the discussions, it seems this looks good to both of you. But I could > be wrong, so may I ask if it's ok for trunk?
OK. Richard. > BR, > Kewen
