On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 3:36 PM David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > Was the dependency added to the dependencies in contrib/gcc_update? > Otherwise the timestamp can get out of sync in a Git checkout.
I checked in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/627667.html which just added it to gcc_update. Thanks, Andrew > > Thanks, David > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 6:20 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 22:56, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 22:39, David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, Arsen > > > > > > > > This patch broke bootstrap because it has introduced a new GCC build > > requirement for autogen that is not a previous requirement to build GCC. > > Previously the repository has included post-processed files. > > > > > > The repo does include the generated bits/version.h file. autogen > > > should only be needed if you modify version.dep > > > > And I've just checked again with an x86_64-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap on a > > box without autogen, and it worked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > +# AutoGen <bits/version.h>. > > > > +.PHONY: update-version > > > > +update-version: > > > > + cd ${bits_srcdir} && \ > > > > + autogen version.def > > > > + > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, David > > > > > > > > > > > >
