On Tue, 8 May 2012, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Are you using a hard-float multilib for your -mabi=32/-mips16 Linux > > testing? > > Yeah. As an example: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg00393.html > > which doesn't look to bad. Clean fortran results, which I expect > would test the FP interworking fairly heavily. (It's certainly > been a source of bug fixes in the past, although I don't remember > the results ever being terrible.)
Yes, these look very good indeed. Especially with QEMU that I do not feel terribly confident about as far as MIPS16 emulation is concerned (I still need to track down a single piece of real silicon supporting both MIPS64 and MIPS16 code at a time). > FAOD, this is with normal MIPS libraries and mips16 executables. > There's still no way of building mips16 multilibs out of the box. I've checked some notes and the issue was with MIPS16 FP PIC code (and therefore obviously SVR4 stubs rather than PLT) indeed. I hope these pieces will get submitted eventually. Maciej
