On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 15:37 +0800, Yujie Yang wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 01:38:40PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 11:57 +0800, Yang Yujie wrote: > > > > > However, for LoongArch, we do not want such a "toplevel" library > > > installation since the default ABI may change. We expect all > > > multilib variants of libraries to be installed to their designated > > > ABI-specific subdirs (e.g. base/lp64d) of the GCC libdir, so that > > > the default ABI can be configured arbitrarily (with --with-abi) > > > while the gcc libdir layout stays consistent. This could be > > > helpful for the distribution packaging of GCC libraries. > > > > Have you tested a --disable-multilib configuration? To me with -- > > disable-configuration everything should be still in the toplevel > > directory, not any sub-directory. > > That's a good point, sorry I missed --disable-multilib here. > > However, you don't really need --disable-multilib since > the libraries are only built once in the default ABI configuration > as long as --with-multilib-list does not request anything more than > that. > > Maybe we should force-enabling multilib in all cases.
I really don't like this. Why must I always remind my self "hey, this is LoongArch, there is a different directory layout" when I don't need multilib at all? -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
